Subject:
|
Re: NBLTC - baseboard standards
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 00:55:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1045 times
|
| |
|
|
For those who are interested in a LTC (local or UK) and who cannot attend
the meeting on 19th January, can we please have any comments/suggestions on
the following by 18th January as we intend to finalise design standards etc.
You input is essential - it will be 100% better if we adopt a standard that
everyone can use for (dare I suggest it) future 'national' meetings with a
large integrated layout.
Many thanks,
Jon
In lugnet.loc.uk, Tony Priestman writes:
> On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Jonathan Reynolds (<GoEtCA.8GL@lugnet.com>) wrote
> at 00:00:10
>
> > > I for one could be tempted into co-operating with others on a more concrete
> > Lego train layout.
> >
> > Hence the requirement for a standard 'module' size
>
> OK, sorry for the delay - too many Christmas do's :-)
>
> After much discussion, crawling about on the floor, measuring, playing
> with Track Designer (why have I never downloaded this before? Great
> tool, thanks Matt :-) and eating gorgeous home made cookies, Jon and I
> came up with the following basic idea. A lot of this is similar to the
> PNLTC, but we've been through it all ourselves, and it makes sense to
> us.
>
> - Base board modules will be five track lengths wide by ten long. This
> equates to 1278mm by 639mm. The reasons for this size are as follows:
>
> + making the board sizes multiples of track lengths means that if you
> want, you can 'pre-build' and just bolt together on arrival.
>
> + having the short side : long side ratio at 1:2 means that you can bolt
> the modules together on long sides or short sides, in exactly the same
> configurations as 2x4 bricks.
>
> + a 639mm wide board will fit through a standard British domestic
> internal doorway, without having to be tipped.
>
>
> Actually, I've just remembered. The modules will be slightly smaller
> than this, so that a foam plastic buffer can be inserted in the gap
> between two boards. This is so that we can make small adjustments in
> length, if required, and the boards will still be bolted tight together.
>
>
> - The height of the top of the baseboard will be 900mm.
>
> + Adults won't get backache from having to bend over.
>
> + It's possible to reach to the back of a module without leaning on
> anything.
>
> + this height is still eye level or lower for most children.
>
>
> - Legs will be built in pairs, and will bolt onto the boards & support
> the joints on assembly. Spacers will be used in place of another board,
> where the legs are on an outside edge.
>
> + Modules will be much less cumbersome & easier to transport without
> legs attached.
>
> + Location & lineup of modules will be much easier if it is defined by
> the tops of the legs.
>
>
> Here are some additional thoughts, relating to the above proposal in
> relation to LEGO geometry:
>
> + Only two boards required to make a minimum complete 'circuit' of
> continuous running track (single or double track).
>
> + Baseboard width equates to 2 x 32x32 stud plates and one 16 x 32
> plate. Length equates to five 32 stud plates. These are standard sizes,
> used in many sets.
>
> + Size allows for standard track centres at ends (for 'straight'
> modules) and also exactly the same offset from edge of baseboard where a
> 90 degree curve is introduced.
>
> + By not trying to cram a circuit onto one board, track centres for main
> running tracks are well clear of the edge hopefully reducing the chance
> of converting the stock into bricks again with every derailment.
>
> and of course (hee hee) :-
> + Module HAD to be 1278mm long to suit the longest available 9v wire
> through Shop at Home!!
>
>
>
> When I have time, I will get a page together with some drawings. There
> is still a lot to decide, e.g. loading gauge standards, but that's not
> relevant until we've got something to build on :-)
>
> Anyone care to comment?
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: NBLTC - baseboard standards
|
| (...) I've got a suggestion about the boards - particularly for those who want to permanently lay one out. Keep the ends of the track half a straight in from the edges of your board. Then, add a loose straight when you bring them together. This (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jan-02, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | NBLTC - baseboard standards
|
| On Sun, 16 Dec 2001, Jonathan Reynolds (<GoEtCA.8GL@lugnet.com>) wrote at 00:00:10 (...) OK, sorry for the delay - too many Christmas do's :-) After much discussion, crawling about on the floor, measuring, playing with Track Designer (why have I (...) (23 years ago, 16-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
