 | | Re: Names of things. —Richie Dulin
|
| | | (...) I was commented on why/how it was incorrectly named... not about where it came from. (...) I don't know. That wasn't my point though, which is on this: on the basis that the Santa Fe Super Chief is incorrectly named, so are the Skull's Eye (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Names of things. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Well sure. I agree! But, see, I'm not arguing with *you*!!! I'm disputing the assertion that BSB is the "wrong" name but Dark Shark is the "right" name which was made upthread. I see no prima facie basis for that assertion, and was asking for (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | (...) Cool. (...) Good. (...) Any 6285 distributed by LEGO Australia would be correctly called a 'Dark Shark'. It would therefore be the original name *in Australia*. Private imports may well be BSBs, and the rerelease is definitely a BSB. But of (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Big Sonnofa Brig? ROSCO (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) OK, now you're making the assertion too, and just as unsupportedly. Granted that LEGO originally released this set with multiple names in english speaking countries... they apparently have now decided to use just one. What makes your statement (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Pete White
|
| | | | | (...) I'm with Larry on this. While that Santa Fe Super Chief is based on a real world object, Lego are just tagging Lego creations with a hopefully marketable identifier. The 6285 I possess is a USA edition and has the name Black Seas Barracuda on (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Paul Baulch
|
| | | | | | "pete white" <aquanaut@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:H3tExp.LLu@lugnet.com... (...) *say* (...) what (...) Well, that would be more appropriate than everyone having to learn (and converse in) American.... after all, it's a Danish product. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) No, it's a universal product made by a Danish multinational which, for the most part, uses English as their internal working language. (not American, mind you, but English... your prejudice is showing through) Most multinationals these days (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Benjamin Whytcross
|
| | | | | | (...) I would have to debate that one...most of the "English" used is American as shown by their mis-spelling of several words [colour being a prime example.] Benjamin Whytcross (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | (...) Because I have a catalog, distributed by LEGO Australia. Calling it a Dark Shark. (...) Absolutely. And they called it 'Dark Shark' in Australia. (...) I'm not whinging about it! Just pointing out that in Australia, the correct name - as (...) (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | Richie, I think this will be my last response to you. If Ben chooses to respond I will respond to that, but I am now starting to wonder if you're deliberately misinterpreting what I am saying, for whatever reason. Let's go back to what Ben said, (...) (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Benjamin Whytcross
|
| | | | (...) And note that I almost entirely post in .loc.au and that this was the forum used, and the message was intended for an Aussie audience. After all, I COULD have posted in .general if I was arguing with the rest of the world. [As a side note, do (...) (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) Excluding catalogs of course, which *do* have set names, and would thus require extra expense in (at least) Aus as well... ROSCO (22 years ago, 12-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Colby Chapman
|
| | | | | <respectfully snipped> (...) </end respectfully snipped> I have totally different catalogues, I did collect them while living in Queensland. But the most interesting thing is that some of them are printed in Germany. Unfortunely I don't have the (...) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Pete White
|
| | | | | (...) I have a catalogue which spells 6286 "The Black Scull". (22 years ago, 14-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Richie Dulin
|
| | | | | | (...) Yep. That's the one with paired oars ;-) Cheers Richie (22 years ago, 14-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Names of things. —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Noted. However qualification still would have been helpful. Saying "most people", without qualification, even in an Australia specific forum, is hopelessly Australia centric. (...) You're preaching to the choir, I've always agreed with you and (...) (22 years ago, 14-Oct-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| | | | |
