|
|
 | | Re: Australian Standards for LEGO
|
| (...) What say we at loc.au develop the first lego Structural code, we call it (Australian Lego Stadard) ALS2000. And Yes the first appendix can be Appendix L < Engineering Geek Discussion mode> Hmm See I'd have to disagree with the Lego being akin (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | SALE PRICES [inc. 6975 fo $35 AUS]
|
| For anyone interested, the sale prices of the folling are a little lower than reported: 6150 $20 6709 $3 4280 $4.99 4211 $4.99 4221 $4.99 6975 $35 [That's right, and they only have 8 so first in :) ] NOTE: these prices are with the 30% taken off, (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: I'm back!
|
| (...) after. (...) Australia, New Zealand and....Canada ? No...I was just thinking on the fly and wondering what one could term a group that encompasses both Australia and New Zealand could be called. ANZAC is a term used to cover soldiers from both (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: I'm back!
|
| (...) ANZACLUG? What's the C for? (Not that Canadians wouldn't be welcome, I'm sure--it's just that pesky airfare thing.) best LFB (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
| Oops sorry, maybe it was Kerry, well maybe if we are both lucky we will get the RIS for xmas, and then we can help each other out :-) I agree with the Duplo comments, I too think that the tunnel is extremely ugly, but my son and daughter want one (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Changes to LUGMAP available for review at Development site.
|
| First, sorry for the crazy cross-posting of this article but I wanted to get everyone that requested a change to the maps all at once. I have set follow-ups to lugnet.org but please feel free to add relevent groups to your followup posts. This way (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.org, lugnet.org.ca, lugnet.org.nl, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.loc.jp, lugnet.org.us.baylug, lugnet.loc.ca.on.tor) !
| | | | | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
| In lugnet.loc.au, Rachel Kingston writes: Thanks for the welcome (and everyone else too!) (...) I think you've got me confused with Kerry here. I'm interested in getting into Technic and Mindstorms but haven't done so yet (it's that single salary (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
| David Drew wrote in message ... (...) to (...) And you call yourself a Technic enthusiast?!? Pah!!! :-) I've broken at least two Technic beams building stuff that simply couldn't take the forces on the structure. Fallen in the line of duty, man!!! (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Re: Australian Roll Call
|
| Hi Dierdre :-) Nice to meet you :-) The more women here the better I think, sometimes I do feel a little outnumbered. Though all the guys here are great. I am aiming to get into technic soon, as I really want the RIS (maybe for xmas, I have started (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | | | Australian Standards for LEGO
|
| (...) Guys, guys. C'mon! Concrete? Loadings? I'd at least put it in as a suppliment to AS4100, since perhaps Parts 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 are directly applicable. Structural LEGO is more akin to steel than concrete, and the loading code is only used to (...) (25 years ago, 23-May-00, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
|
