Subject:
|
Re: Application to exhibit (or why one shouldn't post too soon)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.org.au
|
Date:
|
Wed, 21 Mar 2001 05:09:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1824 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.loc.au, James Howse writes:
> Despite my complaint that I had not heard from AMRA-NSW, the information
> arrived in the post today.
>
> The important info and relevant questions associated with particular issues
> follow.
>
> Dates and times
> Fri 28sep 11-1 set up
> Sat 29sep 9-6 exhibition (access 1hr early for exhibitors)
> Sun 30sep 9-6 " " "
> Mon 1oct 9-5 " " "
Do we have enough personpower to cover this amount of time, considering two
persons would have to be there at any one time to cover toilet breaks and
food/drink breaks.
> Standard of exhibits
> Committee will accept exhibits on merit taking into account the attaction
> and interst provided to the viewing public. Prior to acceptance the
> committee may wish to inspect the exhibit.
> Layouts are to have a suitable covering below the viewing area to near floor
> level. Exhibitors should supply screens or backdrops to their layouts and
> dividers between adjacent stands.
> (from Application to exhibit form: crepe paper or similar not permissible
> under fire regs, an approved type fire extinguisher is required on each stand)
I can see us going to a lot of expense and trouble setting this thing up and
then having the application rejected.
Backdrops ? Dividers ?
> Q: This means we need at least one test run set up to show any possible
> visitors. Building time, space and location are all involved here, as well
> as the possible interstate contributions.
>
> Non-commercial
> payment will be made towards reimbursing the cost of travelling expences
> etc, pending completion of a claim form issued at exhibition.
>
> Q: I assume this means we won't have to pay to display, yay!
What if the application is successful ? But I guess if they are paying to put
the display on, they have a right to veto what goes into it.
> Insurance cover
> non-commercial exhibits will be covered against burglary and fire damage
> only. The policy is not an all risks cover. Exhibitors are reasponsible for
> the supervision of their stand at all times during normal exhibition hours
Burglary is probably the greatest risk. What security arrangements do they
have ? The other trains would probably go first, but do you want to leave
thousands of dollars worth of Lego somewhere for four days.
> Erection of stands
> the erection, dismantling transport and delivery of statnd are the sole
> responsiblity of each exhibitor.
>
> Barriers
> It is pereferable that all exhibits have thier own crowd control system
> Stand signs
> Each non-commercial stand is to display details of their exhibit (scale,
> era, prototype and any relevant information on the layout) including the
> name of the person, club or association in a form easily read by viewers.
> Stand numbers will be provided by AMRA at the exhibition.
Dare I ask what banner we would be standing behind ?
> Q; do we have an era and prototype in mind?
How about Monorail 3001 ?
> Publicitiy
> Press releases will be distributed to the Print media, radio and TV. Any
> addtional publicity that you can give will be of benefit to all
>
> Application deadline
> FOr consideration you application form must be returnedby 31May2001 together
> with full description and particulars of your exhibit suitable for
> publication in the exhibition guide.
>
> Included with the paper that the above was taken from is a souvenir guide
> from last year, motel listings for liverpool in october and an application
> to exhibit form.
>
> I think that's enough to start, thoughts anyone?
Like Santosh I think a smaller show would be better to do first.
We could visit the AMRA show this year just as spectators.
James, I would be seeing who will put their hands up for what days first,
before going to the trouble above.
Liverpool could be hard/time consuming to get to for most people, you're
looking at 13 hour days minimum (incl.travelling).
pete.w(who remembers the show I organised at W4K, and it was Pete.C and myself,
behind a Studs banner (grrr..), though others did offer creations)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
14 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
