 | | double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action, and need to contact Melody Brown ASAP!
|
|
(...) You got that right! I'm glad that I'm not the only old geezer who spotted the double entendre in the subject line. (and yes, I've met Melody and had that been what Geoffrey actually meant, I would totally sympathise with the sentiment as... (...) (24 years ago, 29-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action, and need to contact Melody Brown ASAP!
|
|
Why is it these things all take three weeks before I know about them? (Computer lost all data on hard disk, etc. - I know - have fun picking apart *that* lot!!) I put in a perfectly decent subject line, and someone I don't know except by his (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action, and need to contact Melody Brown ASAP!
|
|
(...) Yes, it is indeed interpreted out of context, that's what Richard and myself find so funny about it. The best double entendres are completely unintentional. I riff on slips I see all the time, nothing personal... but I ain't gonna stop any (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: I've been out of action, and 'NO LONGER' need to contact Melody Brown ASAP!
|
|
hmmm I dunno if I should giggle or cry :P, how about we just post the message and leave out the Melody Brown bit aye? before the newspapers come knocking on my door and asking for my story hehehe j/k j/k j/k. Well all I can say considering my name (...) (24 years ago, 31-Jan-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action...)
|
|
(...) Humorous it was, one of the better ones too. Didn't the Argentinian Air Force employ Double Entendres during the Malvinas/ Falklands dispute ? pete.w (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: double entendres (was Re: I've been out of action, and need to contact Melody Brown ASAP!
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G8158n.MAq@lugnet.com... (...) apart (...) by (...) it (...) in (...) myself (...) I (...) I wouldn't have minded half as much if you'd tried to put it into the right newsgroup. It (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | .loc.au, light and laid back (Re: double entendres and stuff)
|
|
Good grief Geoffrey, lighten up dude, you're bringing the scene down. You're the guy who posted a rude and abrasive message into the group telling us we'd be ignored until you deemed otherwise, claiming you couldn't think of a better way to meet (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: .loc.au, light and laid back (Re: double entendres and stuff)
|
|
I'd answer this, only I don't subscribe (and don't plan on ever looking at that group) to o-t.debate, and I really don't think anywhere else would even fit what I want to talk to Richard about, with the exception of email. I would have taken this to (...) (24 years ago, 1-Feb-01, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
