To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.loc.auOpen lugnet.loc.au in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Local / Australia / 10096
10095  |  10097
Subject: 
Re: .loc.au stats for October
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.loc.au
Date: 
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:47:43 GMT
Viewed: 
1971 times
  
In lugnet.loc.au, Stephen Hurn writes:
> I'm still waiting on the scale that is based on quality of post rather than
> quantity....
> 
> Perhaps some ideas for grading could be:
> -Average word quality multiplied by the total number of words that a
> LUGNetter posts
> -The Sum of all Quality posts
> -The sum of all quality posts minus the poor quality posts
> -An average quality per word ratio
> 
> Of course, to do this we'd need to work out how to measure the quality per
> word or post quality values...

Or you could let each post start at a value of 100 points, then add or subtract
other points for 'good' or 'bad' qualities. For loc.au we could have...
* bonus 10 points for mentioning something actually relevant to Lego.
* lose 50 points for mentioning a sale a week after the start of the sale.
* use of the word Belville in any part of the post and lose all points.
* use of the word Bionicle in any part of the post and lose all points.
* use of the terms 'Life on Mars' and 'impulse sets' in same post, lose
all points.
* blatant traffic-generating post, points are halved.
* expression of anti-American sentiment, lose 5 points, then add 10 points.
* useful set review, total points are doubled.
* novel alternate use of an element illustrated, bonus 25 points.
* commercial tagline, no penalty, but you must buy your next set from BLink,
at 5 times it's RRP.
* Any dissing of the Guild of DickSmiths(GODS) in a post, lose 1 point.
* 10 points for each reply your post receives.
* provide link to unmoderated BShelf page, lose 50 points.

pete.w (fast approaching zero)



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: .loc.au stats for October
 
I'm still waiting on the scale that is based on quality of post rather than quantity.... Perhaps some ideas for grading could be: -Average word quality multiplied by the total number of words that a LUGNetter posts -The Sum of all Quality posts -The (...) (24 years ago, 4-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au)

21 Messages in This Thread:











Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR