Subject:
|
Re: .loc.au stats for October
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Mon, 4 Nov 2002 12:14:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
768 times
|
| |
|
|
I'm still waiting on the scale that is based on quality of post rather than
quantity....
Perhaps some ideas for grading could be:
-Average word quality multiplied by the total number of words that a
LUGNetter posts
-The Sum of all Quality posts
-The sum of all quality posts minus the poor quality posts
-An average quality per word ratio
Of course, to do this we'd need to work out how to measure the quality per
word or post quality values...
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: .loc.au stats for October
|
| (...) The quality of a post can be coarsely approximated by applying quality metrics to each individual word, giving an overall posting content quality. So, say, a message involving quality words like "sensate", "post-expressionalism" and "45.7%" (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
| | | Re: .loc.au stats for October
|
| (...) Or you could let each post start at a value of 100 points, then add or subtract other points for 'good' or 'bad' qualities. For loc.au we could have... * bonus 10 points for mentioning something actually relevant to Lego. * lose 50 points for (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | .loc.au stats for October
|
| What a difference a roll call makes! In October there were 67 posters to .loc.au (23 were foreigners) making a total of 321 posts. The average number of posts made by Australians was 6.25, but the standard deviation was 9.1. The top eleven (in (...) (22 years ago, 4-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
