Subject:
|
Re: .loc.au stats for October
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.au
|
Date:
|
Tue, 5 Nov 2002 14:20:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
746 times
|
| |
|
|
Ah the perils of cutting and pasting, I forgot this bit while reformatting
In lugnet.loc.au, Kerry Raymond writes:
(what any mechanical grading system would SURELY have to rate as a very high
quality post, as it contained lots of big and obscure words, lots of
compound sentences and a fair smattering of numbers... however quoting from
The Matrix may have cost some absolute score points, because it is, however
cool, still mere popular culture rather than work of the literati)
<snip the actual corpus (hey, that's Latin!) >
++Lar (who realises that, regrettably, Kerry may not have been entirely
serious in her post... and who apologises for inadvertantly inflating his
post count with this addendum)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: .loc.au stats for October
|
| (...) The quality of a post can be coarsely approximated by applying quality metrics to each individual word, giving an overall posting content quality. So, say, a message involving quality words like "sensate", "post-expressionalism" and "45.7%" (...) (22 years ago, 5-Nov-02, to lugnet.loc.au)
|
21 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
