Results 1221 1240 of 1413.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
| | Re: New 'Hard to Find' option on shop @ home
|
| (...) Ho-freaking, hum! The US S@H page has six items (as of 9:30am PDT), most of them Arachnoid items... Robo Stalker, 2153, US$29.99 (URL) Dance Ridge, 6718, US$7.99 (URL) Creeper, 6837, US$7.99 (URL) Prowler, 6919, US$39.99 (URL) Stinger, 6969 (...) (24 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.loc.uk)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: Bad Policy #2 (Why all the secrecy, LEGO Direct?)
|
| (...) <snip> (...) Eh? You mean "tired" like bricks? "Tired" like minifigures? "Tired" like accessory parts. "Tired" like just about anything that doesn't immediately gratify or amuse one and requires active user participation and creativity...?! (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: Greed?
|
| (...) Yes, perhaps it is. Ben is E2L(1), please keep that in mind, and sometimes that causes misunderstanding. Reading over your words and his, I don't find that much disagreement, believe it or not. (I'm in the camp that's glad any time Lego, in (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: Announcing LEGO Digital Designer 1.0
|
| (...) Ok, maybe things have changed. Originally TLC was talking about releasing parts as files. My understanding is that they have three "quality" levels of parts: high quality, medium quality, and low-quality. The high quality parts are what their (...) (21 years ago, 30-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: 6 new bulk packs at S@H
|
| (...) Hi! I just placed a Shop@Home order for one of the weekly specials and got the following information about these bulk packs from a very helpful sales representative named Sharon. (...) They are taking backorders now. They will pre-authorize (...) (21 years ago, 18-Mar-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.shopping, FTX)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | My ideas - Space, Castle, etc.
|
| Wow! This is a long thread! Guess that means there's some interest, huh? Pardon me if some of this stuff has been suggested already. I'd like to see the following: Classic Space t-shirts exactly like the ones Mark made. They were super cool! Two (...) (24 years ago, 5-Dec-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: shop.lego.com broken?
|
| I have the same problem if I use Internet Explorer. If I use Netscape Navigator on the same machine it works fine. I suspect I have a bad cookie or something similar that IE is tripping up on. I'm running Windows 2000 so you'll have to adjust the (...) (24 years ago, 26-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: the latest news
|
| On Fri, 21 Apr 2000 10:49:04 GMT, Ice <icestorm@inwave.com> wrote: SNIP (...) Really if we get a chance at the cool old pieces or designs I don't care a SINGLE WHIT! about collectability. If some person selling stuff on ebay doesn't make as much (...) (24 years ago, 22-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) Really. Well, those parts certainly moved fast enough to tell you to contact Todd and ask him to remove it. Those parts also certainly moved fast enough to tell you that there was absolutely legal reasoning behind the "request" when Todd asked (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: the latest news
|
| Firstly, Having been punished by the rating system I apologise for the waste of space and hope this post helps clarify the points I (and others) wished to make in order to help you (The LEGO company) offer me (a customer) better services and (...) (24 years ago, 17-Apr-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
|
| sets (score: 1.107) |
|
| | Re: What set is this part from?
|
| I agree, and I'm sure MANY others agree, that 730 was an absolutely awesome set for parts or building. I don't think it would be considered a Legend, however. I could definitely see it as a Classic or Variant, though. Jake - if you can, mention that (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| |
| sets (score: 1.107) | More: Next Page >>
|