 | | Spybotics demo followup questions — Jake McKee
|
| | | All, Several questions came up during the Spybotics demo at BrickFest that Jeff was unable to answer on the spot. He has since passed those questions and corresponding answers on to me: *** How much memory is in the brick? (compared to RCX) *** Two (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | While I doubt you'd legally be able to answer this, I'm going to ask anyways, just in case you CAN... How hard would it be to replace the EEPROM with one with a larger memory capacity? ;-) (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Sun ONE Internet Technical Support, (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —John Hansen
|
| | | | | (...) According to an e-mail I received from Michael Anderson regarding the Spybotic brick there is "4k EEPROM for persistent program storage (256 bytes available for general use)" To me this sounded like only 256 bytes were available for downloaded (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —Jack Gregory
|
| | | | | | | No, it sounds like a 256 byte scratch pad/heap/whatever. But do we have to reverse engineer these things? I would have thought TLC would have seen the light and would make our life easier this time around. --Jack Gregory "John Hansen" (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions — Jake McKee
|
| | | | | | | | (...) And then there was light... (URL) McKee Sr. Producer LEGO Direct (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —Lester Witter
|
| | | | | | | | Jake Is there documention for the bytes codes and communication, etc for the spybotics. Is it part of the sdk2 distribution? Lester Witter (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —Rob Doucette
|
| | | | | | | | (...) See: (URL) need the Spybotics CD. -Rob. (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —John Hansen
|
| | | | | | | | (...) While setting up the DIY Spybotics SDK is great, it doesn't actually document the byte codes and communication capabilities, etc... of the Spybot brick. But using this DIY SDK I have successfully compiled MindScript code and downloaded it to (...) (22 years ago, 2-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions — Jake McKee
|
| | | | | | (...) You will have to excuse me in this info gathering process... robotics aren't really my strong point, and I am simply relaying info from those who know what they are talking about. I got a few bits of info back: EEPROM: There is a total of 4k (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | | | | (...) That is great, but can it program my VCR? :-) Does this mean that the RCX 2.0 has a greater IR range than the RCX 1.x due to hardware differences? Does the new IR RC Car use the same protocol as the Bionicle Manas as well? Jude (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | RE: Spybotics demo followup questions —Marco Correia
|
| | | | | | (...) Great ! :) (...) Yes, VERY!!! Thanks for your fast reply :) mc. (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —Rob Hendrix
|
| | | | | Now that I think about it, I didn't really like the reasoning behind making a serial product instead of usb. It actually sounds like an excuse to me... Not quite quoted words were, "this product is designed more for children who have hand-me-down (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions — Jake McKee
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm not totally clear about what you want to be convinced of. That is was a good idea, or that price/old computers was the key reason for the decision. Either way, those ARE the reasons, so I'm not sure that I could say anything that would (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions —William R. Ward
|
| | | | | | (...) Well, I for one hope that you continue to favor serial over USB. It makes it a lot easier for those of us not on the bleeding edge, and those of us who use Linux or other alternative OS's. USB is too sophisticated for something as simple as (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | RE: Spybotics demo followup questions —Marco Correia
|
| | | | | (...) [...] (...) If a SB unit can send/receive VLL on top of having "RCX/Scout compatible" IR comms, is this scenario possible: A CyberMaster (using a VLL output pgrm) sends a VLL message to the SB unit that will send some other IR message to the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | RE: Spybotics demo followup questions —Marco Correia
|
| | | | This is a mix of a forward/pseudo-X-post and my comments to the Jake msg on lugnet.lego.direct: (...) So there's an IR on the SB unit, after all :) GREAT! I wasn't understanding how the Remote/Beacon would control the unit through visible light. I (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| | | | |
