Subject:
|
Re: Spybotics demo followup questions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 00:16:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
760 times
|
| |
|
|
No, it sounds like a 256 byte scratch pad/heap/whatever.
But do we have to reverse engineer these things? I would have thought TLC
would have seen the light and would make our life easier this time around.
--Jack Gregory
"John Hansen" <JohnBinder@aol.com> wrote in message
news:Gzq78s.5Et@lugnet.com...
> In lugnet.lego.direct, Jake McKee writes:
> > *** How much memory is in the brick? (compared to RCX) ***
> >
> > Two thirds the memory (4k compared to 6k for program download "with our
> > standard firmware"). And it's persistent: because it's stored in EEPROM, • you
> > can remove the batteries and come back years later to find your program • is
> > still there in good shape.
>
> According to an e-mail I received from Michael Anderson regarding the
> Spybotic brick there is
>
> "4k EEPROM for persistent program storage (256 bytes available for general • use)"
>
> To me this sounded like only 256 bytes were available for downloaded
> programs (i.e., general use rather than firmware use). I hope I'm wrong.
>
> John Hansen
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Spybotics demo followup questions
|
| (...) According to an e-mail I received from Michael Anderson regarding the Spybotic brick there is "4k EEPROM for persistent program storage (256 bytes available for general use)" To me this sounded like only 256 bytes were available for downloaded (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
