 | | Re: How closely do TLC check the builder of the month entries?
|
|
And what the story with the "GTA Riviera" that is essentially a copy of the UCS Rebel Blockade Runner in other colors and some other parts? Should that score points? Just by copying a lego set? And a while back there was this kid who entered a (...) (22 years ago, 29-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: How closely do TLC check the builder of the month entries?
|
|
(...) Now THAT is a dumb kid...he could have at least picked a model that hadn't WON previously! Matt (22 years ago, 29-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | How closely do TLC check the builder of the month entries?
|
|
Am I mistaken, or is the entry for July with the most votes (URL) the same as the winner for May (URL) ? ROSCO (22 years ago, 29-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More train colour kits
|
|
(...) (22 years ago, 19-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Rules for Lego trademarks on T-shirts ?
|
|
Without giving too much away: I have worked up a high-quality digital version of a logo used in some Lego product lines. I would like to have some t-shirts made up with this logo on them and offer them to LUGnetters for purchase, so they can dress (...) (22 years ago, 17-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More train colour kits
|
|
(...) It's a UK-US thing, I guess. Using either sense 1 or sense 3 (depending on your point of view, I suppose), US meaning for booty now encompasses the posterior portion of the anatomy, especially of the female persuasion. And yes, it's often (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: More train colour kits
|
|
(...) booty 1. Plunder taken from an enemy in time of war. 2. Goods or property seized by force or piracy. 3. A valuable prize, award, or gain. Okay, just don't kick it too hard. It might be valuable. I presume "arse" would have thrown up similar (...) (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More train colour kits
|
|
(...) What typo? (22 years ago, 16-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More train colour kits
|
|
(...) Over here we prefer to kick booty rather than botty, but ya, that would be super keeno nifty! Dark red is just all around great IMHO. (in the draft (of 2 RBRS) we had at our last MichLUG/LTC meeting, I scored a lot of the dark read even though (...) (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: More train colour kits
|
|
In article <H0tyLt.B80@lugnet.com>, "Jason J Railton" <j.j.railton@ntlworld.com> wrote: snip (...) righteous botty? You just might be alone! I don't normally point out typos, but this one made me chuckle. Thanks! Chris (22 years ago, 15-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | More train colour kits
|
|
The first page of the My-Own-Train instructions hints at future colour kits, so can I make a suggestion? DARK RED Am I alone in thinking that that would kick righteous botty? These have to be a big enough success by now to justify some more colours. (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | steep corner slopes
|
|
To Whom It May Concern: More of these: (URL) red and black would be very nice. Frankly, it's such a great element I am tempted to ask for more colors, but the basic roof slope colors would be a good start. The ultimate fantasy (excluding true bulk) (...) (22 years ago, 14-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Bricks, Plates at S@H
|
|
"Eric Brok" <e.c.t.brok@nospampl...e.kpn.com> wrote in message news:H0s4v8.46v@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) at (...) own (...) [ ... snipped ... ] That is pretty useful - thanks. I had to fix some line breaks introduced by either (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Bricks, Plates at S@H
|
|
(...) For convenience, I use a script on a local page, which shows all pictures at shop.lego.com between certain ranges. Just put the following code in a new text file, and give it a .html name. As long as you only use this sript for personal use, (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0rpsE.LM2@lugnet.com... (...) or (...) bad (...) while (...) javascript, (...) variety (...) right? (...) Communicator (...) Well speaking as a web developer (and quite a few people on (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
(...) I can't believe you wrote that -- you're basically defending bad code / bad design. There is no reason for a simple left nav to bomb in ANY browser. And while I haven't investigated why it doesn't work (not my job), everything that I saw in (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
(...) Yes, but what percentage of the General Public (i.e. Parents) use Galeon or Opera?? I think it is a case of both of you not being members of the Primary Target Market group. Paul Sinasohn LUGNET #115 (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
(...) Wow, that's amazing. I guess I've become too Galeon-dependent---I can't remember the last time I even looked as shop.lego.com from the Windows side. Kudos to the lego.com Web team---browsing (at least for the United States) is no longer (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Bricks, Plates at S@H
|
|
"Maggie Cambron" <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message news:H0qrq0.M6o@lugnet.com... (...) Dear LEGO: Please spend some calories and make the bulk bricks and accessories easier to browse. The fact that the items can only be browesed via the left (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
(...) You have links to pictures? You should see some of the goodies that had at the Hobby Expo and Wonderfestival in Japan. Here's a link to some Macross coverage . . . (URL) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
(...) I should've know better than to say "loose joint" in front of professor snead! You'd be disappointed to hear this Chris but I haven't even had a chance to use these in any build yet, even though I swore I would. Lack of time more than (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
(...) Aaah, but what about the Zoids Blox series?? I just picked up two sets while at the San Diego Comic Con and interestingly enough the holes in the blocks/blox fits and axle or pin perfectly. Hmmmm.... (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
(...) You realize, of course, there is a very nice way to stiffen those joints significantly in both axes. I'll post it in a couple of weeks, but the technique is very similar to the plate hinge stiffening technique. Personally, on my wish list is a (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
(...) Hmm...I've seen some of the model kits by Bandai, and those are pretty cool, but I haven't been holding my breath for the gundam lego, because I know that's never going to happen. It would be cool, but until then, I guess we'll have to do (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
(...) The listed copyright owners of the core Gundam series are Sotsu Agency and Sunrise. Bandai is the only company that I can think of that is currently producing Gundam related merchandise. There is a reason for this though, Sunrise is a (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
(...) Oh, definitely. It would be great to see some lego models, particularly of the Gundam Wing or Transformers line. I think that would be definitely innovative, and contribute to some great sales. Unfortunately, I think the Gundam License is (...) (22 years ago, 11-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
I would definitely like to see Lego acquire a license and started producing mecha themed sets(if they can't do something cool on their own - highly likely). To some extent I believe in the minds of TLC, they already are through Bionicle and some of (...) (22 years ago, 11-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Would you buy it?????
|
|
I've made a point of avoiding video games for years now. It's weird because I love them. I know this is gonna seem REALLY Old Skool, but, I loved my Nintendo! I had all the Space Ship - Multiple Gun games. Then I realized, the more I played Video (...) (22 years ago, 11-Aug-02, to lugnet.build.mecha, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: How do you spell Infomaniac?
|
|
(...) Hi Clark, In the original Lego Island PC game, he was the Infomaniac without the R. I suspect either the person who did the 6740 writeup made a mistake, or (and this would be another terrible example of TLC caving in to pressure as they did (...) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | How do you spell Infomaniac?
|
|
There is a character in the new stunts sets, I think he is the news reporter. His name is spelled Informaniac on the SAH site: (URL) spelled Infomaniac (no R) on the lego.com site: (URL) I like the R better, it's more of a play on his job. The (...) (22 years ago, 9-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: New Products on Shop@Home
|
|
(...) The oldest 'new' set I could find listed, was 9274 from 1998! Mark (22 years ago, 8-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) Hey everyone. I am the culprit as Steve Bliss has mentioned. Here are the details. The package was from some kind of folding screwdriver. The plastic cover slips right off easily, there was only a staple holding it in position. I kept the (...) (22 years ago, 7-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) I'm not seeing it. Maybe it's a defect of the price tag that happens to correspond to the reflection? (...) That's because it's not a plastic-glued-to-cardboard blister pack. The plastic is formed so that the cardboard back can slide in and (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.fun)
|
| |
| | New Products on Shop@Home
|
|
How long do products stay in the 'New' section on the Official Site. It's not going to be long before the entire contents of the database is going to be on the one page. Its kind of loosing its purpose. Time for a cleanup ?? -- James Stacey (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
Besides being well-done and funny, we can recognise a highly ironical message behind this joke: If mainstream TLG were to produce a useful, very generic parts pack these days such as TECHNIC ball joints, it would probably market it as a hot-themed (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Contacting LEGO Australia.....
|
|
Hello all Could someone please let me know the best way to contact LEGO regarding..... ....A friend of mine is setting up a Playgroup with a specific focus on parents that have or have experienced depression or other mental illness's. It is a (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.au, lugnet.people, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
"Kevin Salm" <kdsalm@dreamscape.com> wrote in message news:H0ELLI.K33@lugnet.com... (...) call it (...) but (...) It was not me. I just happened to come accross it on Brickshelf and thought it was the oddest thing i'd seen in a while. I did not (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
XFUT: Off-topic.fun (...) plastic (...) left (...) pictures. But that does not prove or disprove that the item in question is or is NOT a genuine Lego product. My vote is that it is NOT a genuine Lego product. If it were, I would call it the lamest (...) (22 years ago, 6-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
Wow, time flies when you're having fun. Is it april again already? Duq "Troy's Surplus Lego" <legosales@tcphoto.net> wrote in message news:H0DwKA.Ltw@lugnet.com... (...) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting retail pack
|
|
(...) Well, if it is a fake, it appears that someone went to the trouble to actually make one, as it shows up on the table in these other shots in the same gallery: (URL) (22 years ago, 5-Aug-02, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
