Subject:
|
Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 9 May 2005 22:39:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2456 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jeff Szklennik wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote:
|
SNIP
I’ve thought about this some more, maybe add $1 to sets over $10 so the small
‘impulse’ sets don’t change. OR raise the average price per piece some fraction
of cent (or 1 cent if absolutely neccessary). PLEASE DON’T MOVE ANY NEW
PRODUCTION TO CHINA!!!!!
| |
| |
- How would you change existing LEGO products if you wanted to sell them for
|
Sets should proportionally have more inexpensive classic/traditional parts to
keep actual cost down, but piece count & therefore bring retail price a
little higher. Classic/traditional parts include: bricks, slopes, plates,
& classic/traditional specialized pieces (hinges (NOT click-hinges),
car bases, wheels & axles, antennas, tools, etc). Don’t introduce
built-up/specialized pieces & new colors so often.
|
snip
snip
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
| In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote: SNIP (...) I already do & I look forward to having kids so i can buy more (...) Best toy/hobby EVER! (...) NONE - in fact go back to Basic & Universal sets like (URL) 730> & (URL). By the way, these sets would (...) (20 years ago, 20-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
68 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
