Subject:
|
Re: Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego, lugnet.color
|
Date:
|
Sun, 17 Apr 2005 09:32:57 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
10260 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jake McKee wrote:
> * Would you buy LEGO toys for children 0-11? Y/N
Yes.
> * Why / Why not?
Despite of the "blay-desaster" it is still one of the best toys on market.
> * What feature(s) would you add if you were the marketing director of LEGO?
More products like the designer sets.
More spare parts.
More lines that last for more than 2 years. (As town and castle did in the
80ies)
> * How would you change existing LEGO products if you wanted to sell them for
> more money?
Return to quality as known in the 60ies, 70ies and 80ies. Put more bricks into
one product, but keep the elements more basic (and so cheaper in production
costs).
> * What new products would you launch?
The products are quite perfect (designer sets + shop at home products are 100%
perfect) (only the colours are no longer useful...)
> * What should LEGO be doing that it isn’t now?
Change back to old colours and old quality standards. Do not break given
promises. Try to act after old Ole's statement: "Only the best is good enough
for our children". Keep the LEGO world free from violence - our kids do not need
that in their children's room.
Thanks for listening.
Ben
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Holy Mackerel! LEGO survey...
|
| All, I know that some of you have attempted to fill out the survey announced yesterday on LEGOfan.org, only to be turned away with a message about the survey being complete. After some late night phone calls and early morning emails, I've been to (...) (20 years ago, 16-Apr-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego) !!
|
68 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
