 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —David Koudys
|
| | | (...) There was no promise! Stop saying that! Stop spinning this! At the time Jake said what he said, that's *exactly* what was going on--TLC had some leftover Maersk Blue pellets and no contract with Maersk Blue to warrant making more. Those are (...) (19 years ago, 23-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | (...) Crying is very unbecomming.... (...) Can I use this defense on my wedding vows? "Honest dear I meant what I was saying at the time but circumstances changed...." SNIP (...) The facts are that Lego Promised this to be a limited run. A new (...) (19 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Ka-On Lee
|
| | | | | (...) <roll eyes> How about "Well dear I did say no more buying Lego this month, but you see they have 30% off this week..." Seriously, vows? (...) Well Dave it looks like you can end this. I must say your display of patient is just as impressive as (...) (19 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | | | (...) SNIP (...) SNIP Exactly If I made a promiss not to buy anymore Lego for the month the latest sale would be a pretty poor excuse for breaking that promiss. -Ken (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Reinhard "Ben" Beneke
|
| | | | | | (...) Thanks Ken, for being that patient in explaining your point (which is mine at the same time). A lie is a lie and a broken promise is a broken promise. And Lego is having no finacial success while Playmobil (in Europe) and Megabloks (in (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | (...) One more time from the top--if you want to misinterpret what happened, by all means. But, let's look at Ken's very example, which is completely inaccurate to the actual situation. (...) LEGO made no such promise and there was no going back on (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | Snipped most of it to focus on one point (...) Note that saying that you think a discussion is over, does anyone have anything NEW to add, is not censorship. If no one adds anything new, asking that people not repeat the same points except LOUDER is (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Ditto (...) Censorship does come into play when you say "LUGNET doesn't (yet) have threadlocking. But I personally (and this is not a statement of policy, I am not wearing my hat) wish we did. Because if we did, I'd lock this thread so fast it (...) (19 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | | | | | (...) I have no need to misinterpert anything. I can read what jake posted on these boards and words mean things. I read what Lego chose to publicly post. (...) They should have found a diffrent way to satisfy Maersk and keep their word to the (...) (19 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | | | (...) Thanks for the support. Unfortunatly while I could go back and point out the posts where I have been personally called a liar, my asking of a simple moral question has been labeled a detriment to the site and some how it it said to "impune" (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Bryan Wong
|
| | | | (...) You're comparing this situation to wedding vows? Ok that's just ridiculous. (...) <snip> (...) Dave K, if you're still reading this, it's clear that Ken here really believes that LEGO has/had made some sort of special "promise" with him - (...) (19 years ago, 24-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Ken Nagel
|
| | | | (...) SNIP (...) Jake Mckee posted on these very boards “Then it’s time for another new adventure! It measures 69cm long and is your last chance to buy Maersk bricks! AND:"This is a small run too – only 14,000 total, with 10,000 coming to Shop At (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update) —Timothy Gould
|
| | | | Dear Ken, I propose a very simple solution. If you don't buy the new Maersk set because of your moral convictions that it is wrong then Jake's original statement, and any other TLC 'implications' becomes true. It will be your last chance to buy the (...) (19 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | |
