Subject:
|
Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 28 Dec 2004 00:40:14 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
8440 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> Snipped most of it to focus on one point • Ditto
>
> LUGNET does not censor. It does, however, require that people abide by the rules
Censorship does come into play when you say "LUGNET doesn't (yet) have
threadlocking. But I personally (and this is not a
statement of policy, I am not wearing my hat) wish we did. Because if we did,
I'd lock this thread so fast it would make your head spin. There is NOTHING
useful happening here"
I have personally been called a liar several times in this thread. Since the
debate is a moral question I legitimatly stated I keep my word and asked my
opposition if they do the same. That impugns nothing. If your wish is to keep
order I trust you'll be contacting those that called me a liar... Ken
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: A Community Problem (Was: Re: 10152 Update)
|
| Snipped most of it to focus on one point (...) Note that saying that you think a discussion is over, does anyone have anything NEW to add, is not censorship. If no one adds anything new, asking that people not repeat the same points except LOUDER is (...) (20 years ago, 27-Dec-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
257 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
