 | | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
Well, as one who was looking forward to seeing the New LEGO.com, the anxiety is killing me..... But, I can wait a few more days.... Thanks for the update!! Gene Weissinger (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
Hi Brad. Thanks for keeping us up to date -- I'm sure we all appreciate it. I realize things like this often take more time than planned. [Followup set to .general] (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
Don't worry about it Brad, personally, I'm used to being dissapointed by your company. :-| Scott A (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G0pqvC.5or@lugnet.com... (...) your (...) Its my understanding that Brad and the LD team have been working very hard on the new launch, and really, what's a few days' delay? Cut them a little (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) <sigh> Really? Dissapointed (sic)? I've seen *great* strides made by TLC. Think about where we were even 3 years ago-- the advent of Town Jr, pre-SW, pre-LLC, (pre-orange;-) Heck, now we have a TLC big-wig who actually listens to and cares (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO.new is coming
|
|
When is the new site supposed to be up! It's September 11th! John (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Scott A wrote: [snipped one-liner] Scott, Was there any point to your response, other than scoring a cheap shot? My take on Brad's latest posting is this: it's common for technical projects (new software, new web pages, etc) (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) your (...) Think (...) cares (...) Robert Burns, I believe. The best-laid plans o' mice an' men Gang aft a-gley, An' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain For promised joy. (...) The trouble with doing (sic) is that you have to be correct (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Yes, I thought I'd get it in early before all the sycophants woke up. Do you always point out pointless posts, or is it just that I have dared to question the great one? (...) A deadline is a deadline. When I am expected to meet a deadline, I (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
On Sun, 10 Sep 2000, Brad Justus wrote: [SNIP] (...) [SNIP] A very small part of me is extremely disappointed, and a larger part is extremely relieved. I've got another month to pay off the credit card... -Laura (loves shopping online) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
"Scott A" <s.arthur@hw.ac.uk> wrote in message news:G0qAoF.I02@lugnet.com... (...) you (...) question (...) Why are you making a personal attack on Steve when he made a valid observation on your comments? (...) common (...) all (...) Sure, deadlines (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) I thought he was expressing disatisfaction with Lego in general. I don't entirely agree with him, but I thought the cheap shot was the above response. (...) In my judgment Steve made the personal attack. It's nice that a Lego representative is (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Sorry, I did not mean to have my comments construed as a personal attack. I 100% accept that my post was rather pointless, my reply to Steve was meant to be a rhetorical question which infers that my post was not the only pointless one on (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Looks like you missed it by two. (...) Rarely - I'd spend too much time posting followups to myself. (...) Nope, that's not it, either. Not that you questioned anyone. John Neal's post is a much better response than I'll ever be able to write. (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) (Backpedaling) Oh, did you think that I thought that Brad was quoting Shakespeare *there*? ;-) (...) Touché, Bruce. Nuttin' like being hoisted by one's own petard... and we Larritarians don't stomach humble pie very well:-) -John (...) (26 years ago, 11-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) LOL! Can anyone say "junior"? I know this post has caused some controversy, but I did think it was funny. I also think serious points could be drawn from it too. Juniorized pieces are a legitimate gripe for many of us. High price/piece ratios (...) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) OK. One more time. Let's all remember this, the offical party line is: Send me all your Lego pieces. There, that should do it. Let's party. -- Terry (the Critical Sycophant) K -- (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Scott, Do What I'm doing down here in Australia. Have very little to no expectations. That way you're rarely disappointed, and occasionally pleasantly surprised. Glad to say I haven't been disappointed yet ;) Santosh (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | RE: the best laid plans of mice and men
|
|
(...) Or pleasently surprised, I would guess :) Benjamin Whytcross BWhytcro@PacificAccess.com.au Ph: (03) 9856 5282 Directory Technology Pty Ltd 1/436 Elgar Road, Box Hill, 3128 Growing older is compulsory..Growing up isn't :-) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | What if 9V went away? (Was re: LTMA vs NMRA
|
|
(...) I think I would remain active in Lego Trains. Whether or not I stayed with 9V or converted to the putative new system depends on the details. I convert all my 12V stuff to 9V, not because (V is better than 12V operationally, (it isn't, 12V has (...) (26 years ago, 12-Sep-00, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.dear-lego)
|
