 | | Lego SAH ....c'mon already
|
|
Having placed a substantial shop at home order earlier today, I remembered references to a $39 price on the Droid Development Kit, so I asked what the current price was for that item. I was quoted the $59 price so I passed. Lo and behold, I received (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Surely this is not legal
|
|
G'Day Looks like this auction has been pulled by eBay, I guess the lawyers have been busy..... Cheers Oliver Play Well "r2" <lego@r2eng.com> wrote in message news:G6Fy7w.EsK@lugnet.com... (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
LEGO is giving you the opportunity to build something you love and to show it off to everyone while they stand proudly behind you. You want to moan and complain about that? Ashamed you all should be. Build On! (or not, if the Official Rules say you (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
"Suzanne D. Rich" <suz@baseplate.com> wrote in message news:<G6MMIy.MrI@lugnet.com>... (...) here (...) contest (...) for (...) see (...) Suz, I mentioned something about an "MOC of the Year Award" type contest a few weeks back. See (URL) . When (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego SAH ....c'mon already
|
|
(...) It's not deliberate on their part. All the catalogue offers are keyed to the catalogue code (on the back, in the yellow brick). If they don't have that code, then they will see only the default price, and not the special offers from that (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
I do not think most of us want to make any money off our creations, but should we have to give up all rights to our work? Do other contests that judge artistic creations require that the artist relinquish all rights to the creation? (Really, I (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) big (...) fine (...) to (...) I think the issue with TLG may be litigation avoidance. If LEGO receives a bunch of ideas and designs but does not obtain the rights then they must check every new design they market against the entries to insure (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) Although I haven't thought about LUGNET's specific involvement, I couldn't agree with you more about contests. Recently I've been giving this great consideration and I believe such events can do many positive things both for individual (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Contest goals? (was Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) Thanks for the insight Suz. I couldn't agree with you more! There is no way I would ever give up ownership on a design I did. Although I am not a train buff, I really do marvel at the wonderful MOC's that they create. Gary Istok (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: Fansploitation
|
|
(...) Good point. Combining subthreads... would a non exclusive royalty free license granted at entry solve that problem? IANAL so I am just guessing wildly but I think it might. I have to reiterate my opinion that I feel the disparagement of this (...) (26 years ago, 5-Jan-01, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
