Subject:
|
Re: peeron inventory
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.inv
|
Date:
|
Tue, 3 Apr 2007 01:06:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
4369 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.inv, Dan Boger wrote:
> John Patterson wrote:
> > Corrections sent to inv@peeron again are not getting posted. It has been a bit
> > since they did a few. And again I am finding a lot of mistakes in the
> > inventories. I still stick by the 95% figure. By posting changes needed or at
> > least noted in the inventory here you all can see the problem with the
> > inventories. I would suggest if you need an inventory be suspect of any that
> > say they were done from the instructions (again I have not gotten to the smaller
> > sets, most of what I have been doing for the last 6 months were larger sets and
> > buckets.)
>
>
> John - I certainly agree that you shouldn't assume an inventory made
> from instructions (or pictures for that matter) is 100% correct. That's
> exactly the reason why we specify the source of the inventory in the
> first place!
>
> As for updates, once again, I'll point out that the *volunteers* that
> take care of these updates do so when they have a large enough blocks
> free time. And to be frank, your demands and accusations are just
> making this less fun to do, which only reduces the time people will want
> to give to the project.
>
> I really appreciate the work you're doing, and the corrections you're
> sending in. They *are* being processed and considered. Just please
> accept the fact that some things might take more time than you'd like.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dan
Thanks Dan. I don't believe that I made accusations about anything. I just
said that it is taking a long time to make the corrections. I realize that
there are volunteers and I would be willing to volunteer. I do not think that
it takes more time to correct than what it takes me to figure out the correct
inventory. Do you not agree that the inventories have a major problem? Perhaps
I expect too much, I was just commenting on the time it takes, which is a fact.
I come from 24 years in the military and then I managed a corporation for the
next 14 years. I just took it very seriously when mistakes were made and
corrected everything that I or one of my soldiers or workers did as quickly as I
could. Not only am I sending you corrections (and it takes a lot of time to
figure things out starting from an incorrect inventory), I am sending in tons of
sets of pictures, sets not listed, many part pictures that you are missing and
sticker sheets that are not listed. All this does take a bit of time and I just
told people that it is taking a rather long time. That is better than letting
them think that the inventories are correct. The pictures of sets get posted
quickly, the parts pictures so-so and the corrections slowly. I made only a
partial list of sets with incorrect inventory which users should know about. I
didn't say anything nasty just stated the state of what is happening. Do you
not agree that it is important that people know that these inventories are
wrong?
I really do not want to get into a long drawn out he said she said thing. I
will just post what I find, send the corrections to you and let what happens
with them happen. I will make no editorial comments that may be construed as
"not nice." It seems that a lot of people here are more concerned about how
something is said rather than what is said. I noticed that on the back and
forth comments about Brickfest and their profit if there is any.
John P
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: peeron inventory
|
| (...) Then please, leave out the commentary. You come across as being condescending, insulting, and rude. If you have corrections that you want to post to Lugnet, well, fine I guess. But if your intent is to start a flame war so that it draws (...) (17 years ago, 3-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: peeron inventory
|
| (...) John - I certainly agree that you shouldn't assume an inventory made from instructions (or pictures for that matter) is 100% correct. That's exactly the reason why we specify the source of the inventory in the first place! As for updates, once (...) (17 years ago, 2-Apr-07, to lugnet.inv)
|
22 Messages in This Thread: ![peeron inventory -John Patterson (2-Apr-07 to lugnet.inv)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Jonathan Lopes (2-Apr-07 to lugnet.inv)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -John Patterson (2-Apr-07 to lugnet.inv)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Bob Parker (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Timothy P. Smith (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Bob Parker (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Timothy P. Smith (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Ross Crawford (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Dan Boger (2-Apr-07 to lugnet.inv)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -David Eaton (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.inv, lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -John Patterson (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Wayne McCaul (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Timothy Gould (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -John Patterson (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Timothy Gould (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -John Patterson (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -Timothy Gould (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -David Eaton (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -David Koudys (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -David Eaton (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: peeron inventory -John Patterson (3-Apr-07 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|