 | | Re: Who is that guy?
|
|
He was apparently a poltergeist. Rick Mayal (Young Ones, Bottom) played him in the film to be cut out completely, something about him making the storyline good I think :) James "Adam Murtha" <adammurtha@shaw.ca> wrote in message (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is that guy?
|
|
(...) Except he isn't in the movie. 8^( (23 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Who is that guy?
|
|
(...) Yep, Peeves is one of Hogwarts' resident ghosts-- a poltergeist to be exact, and a bit of a PITB. BTW were you able to find the SW combo pack you were looking for? If not I can take a look next time I'm at TRU (those value packs seem to go (...) (23 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Who is that guy?
|
|
I just got back from seeing the Harry Potter movie (which I enjoyed) and I started thinking about the Lego sets. My immediete question is who is the 'ghost' guy in Snape's Class? Peeves is the name, I think I've heard. Or was he one of the ghosts (...) (23 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: MOC: Wizard's Tower
|
|
(...) Harry Potter world than any of the sets that LEGO themselves produced for that series. If LEGO released this set tomorrow I would buy it. Do you hear that LEGO? If you were to release sets like this, that have actual walls and a roof... you (...) (23 years ago, 8-Dec-01, to lugnet.castle.org.cw, lugnet.castle, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) I am an outsider on both counts as I am someone that would prefer to read the source mythology over most fantasy fiction in the first place, but even I am excited by the LOTR movie. LOTR has stood the test of time, and while I somehow never (...) (23 years ago, 5-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) Speaking as an outsider, since I haven't read more than a few pages of Potter (though I'm casually familiar with the overall plot), I would suggest that one of Rowlings' greatest virtues is that the vast story she's crafted is one of very, (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) Show me any book that is totally original. As a childrens book, which as you point out it is, I have to say that the series is building up to be an impressive set of books with the prisoner of Azkaban being my favourite so far. Yes of course, (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) to (...) Never mind the film itself, what about the SW part 2 trailer? That was worse. SW has clearly drifted into the mainstream Hollywood bracket, with all those earth-bound shots of scenic beauty and lovey-dovey romantic diversions. Pah! (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
| |
| | Re: Saw the movie today! (bit OT)
|
|
(...) oo-er :) (...) yes the very same. It was over a character from the book of death, but he's not going to sue now (I checked) whoo hoo 15 days till Fellowship of the Ring -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a citizen of (...) (23 years ago, 4-Dec-01, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.harrypotter)
|
