To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 9569
9568  |  9570
Subject: 
Re: Top Ten Toys on A&E
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 3 Nov 1999 19:08:27 GMT
Viewed: 
4382 times
  
Allan Bedford wrote:

> > Timothy Carl Buchheim wrote:
> > 
> > > Gary Istok wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > I agree, how Ameri-centric of them.  I saw the show, and thought for • sure that
> > > > LEGO would be #1.  Play-doo beat out LEGO, get real.  Lincoln Logs • beat out
> > > > LEGO?  Yeah, when was the last time Lincoln Logs could build any • thing except
> > > > a Log Cabin?
> > > 
> > > hmm.. we need horizontal log bricks so we can build log cabins..
> > > shouldn't be too hard to make, and they'd be useful for all sorts of
> > > things (unlike lincoln logs)
> > > 
> > > i had lincoln logs and tinker toys when i was young, but you don't see
> > > me using them now..   On the other hand, I can see myself getting out • my
> > > erector sets to build something.
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Tim Buchheim
> > 
> > Tim,  I agree.  Erector set, is definitely worth the top 10 list.  It • could be what
> > inspired the LEGO Technic System.
> > 
> > Gary Istok
> 
> Well, Gary and Tim... I gotta step in and disagree with you on something
> here.  As the son of a life-long Meccano collector your comments on Erector
> sets make me cringe a bit.    Bear a couple of things in mind:
> 
> 1.  Meccano was very popular in Europe, having originated in England.  So I
> venture to guess that if anything like that inspired the Technic system, it
> was probably Meccano, and not Erector.
> 
> 2.  Erector was arguably the lesser of the two systems.  Erector was to
> Meccano what Megablocks are to LEGO.  Although there was nothing wrong with
> Erector, it just wasn't Meccano.  As with Megablocks, the quality was
> simply not the same, and many people who got hooked on Meccano simply
> couldn't get past that difference.
> 
> An interesting historical note though.  For the majority of the company's
> history, Meccano refused to sell bulk parts to collectors or builders.
> (Although individual parts were at one time available through dealers in
> retail outlets).
> 
> Finally, there is one point one which we all seem to agree.  Lincoln Logs
> were fun, but really only for building log cabins.  And how many of those
> do you need?
> 
> Comments and/or debate is welcome. I've cross-posted this message to
> off-topic.debate.
> 
> Best regards,
> Allan
> --
> Expert Builder Website - The Megaproject Showcase
> http://www.execulink.com/~apotome/expert.htm

Allan, I'm not familiar with Meccano.  So if you know both Meccano and Erector
Set, and say Meccano is better, who am I to disagree.  And the analogy with
LEGO & MEGABLOCKS certainly brings it into perspective.

Gary Istok



Message has 1 Reply:
  (canceled)
 

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Top Ten Toys on A&E
 
(...) sure that (...) beat out (...) thing except (...) my (...) could be what (...) Well, Gary and Tim... I gotta step in and disagree with you on something here. As the son of a life-long Meccano collector your comments on Erector sets make me (...) (27 years ago, 3-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)

21 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR