To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 7133
7132  |  7134
Subject: 
Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.fun
Date: 
Tue, 31 Aug 1999 14:43:56 GMT
Viewed: 
1721 times
  
John Neal wrote:

Steve Bliss wrote:



Just wear thick shoes -- those studded decks can *hurt*! :)

I was thinking the same thing-- hopefully squishy bricks will be the rage by
then;-)

Boy, imagine the product liability lawsuits from people who tripped on
the studs and did a face plant. Wonder if TLG could counter sue you for
trademark infringement for displaying a permanent LEGO embossed in your
face in reverse?

--
Frank Filz

-----------------------------
Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com
Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
 
(...) I was thinking the same thing-- hopefully squishy bricks will be the rage by then;-) -John (...) (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

24 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR