Subject:
|
Re: star destroyer?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build
|
Date:
|
Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:54:50 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
johnneal@uswest.netSPAMLESS
|
Viewed:
|
1275 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
David Eaton wrote:
>
>
> (Is it just me or are SW scales just plain dumb? I mean a 5 mile long starship?
> Why? A 100 mile diameter battlestation? The super laser doesn't need THAT much
> of a surrounding platform. It's got more than a hundred million square miles of
> floorspace in it! WHO NEEDS ALL THAT?
Well, here in America bigger *is* better, and so I guess Lucas naturally fell into
that trap trying to sell tickets;-) [1]
> Just think how much that would cost if it
> was all nice hardwood flooring... "190 planets' rain forests died in the making
> of the hardwood flooring of this Death Star"
LOL And think of the amount of Mop N'Glow you'd need;-)
> ... Just my random rant-- I love
> Star Wars, but Star Trek makes just a whole lot more practical sense about
> certain things)
I agree. ST:TNG et al have thought through life in Space *much* better than the
"fairy tales in Space", aka Star Wars.
> Dave
-John
[1] pardon my reference to another thread in another NG.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: star destroyer?
|
| (...) Well, if *I* were Emperor, I'd need that space just to fit my Lego collection. Well, it wouldn't all be for Lego, but I would need a logistics base for the Lego-bearers, modelling slave droids, collection administrators, piece acquisition (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: star destroyer?
|
| (...) I'd have to agree... the SMALLEST microfig tie figher I can imagine (1x2 tile, 1x1 round plate, 1x2 plate w/ centered stud) is about 9.6mm wide. TIE fighters are (roughly) 6 meters wide. The Executer (the super star destroyer) is about 8,000 (...) (25 years ago, 30-Aug-99, to lugnet.build)
|
24 Messages in This Thread: ![star destroyer? -Matthew Scott Lindsey (28-Aug-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: star destroyer? -Eric Joslin (28-Aug-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: star destroyer? -Matthew Scott Lindsey (29-Aug-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: star destroyer? -Jeremy Sproat (29-Aug-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: star destroyer? -David Eaton (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.build)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: star destroyer? -Jeremy Sproat (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: star destroyer? -David Eaton (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.starwars)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -John Neal (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Jeremy Sproat (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Todd Lehman (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Gary R. Istok (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Jeff Johnston (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Scott Edward Sanburn (3-Sep-99 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Steve Bliss (31-Aug-99 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -John Neal (31-Aug-99 to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Jeff Stembel (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/268.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -James Brown (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Jeremy Sproat (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -James Brown (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Greg Majewski (30-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Steve Bliss (31-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -John Neal (31-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer? -Frank Filz (31-Aug-99 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|