To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 7130
7129  |  7131
Subject: 
Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Tue, 31 Aug 1999 14:03:44 GMT
Reply-To: 
JOHNNEAL@USWESTspamcake.NET
Viewed: 
1754 times
  
Steve Bliss wrote:



Just wear thick shoes -- those studded decks can *hurt*! :)

I was thinking the same thing-- hopefully squishy bricks will be the rage by
then;-)

-John



Steve
--
More tiles!  I must have more tiles!



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
 
(...) Boy, imagine the product liability lawsuits from people who tripped on the studs and did a face plant. Wonder if TLG could counter sue you for trademark infringement for displaying a permanent LEGO embossed in your face in reverse? (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Holobrick vs Real McCoy (was Re: star destroyer?
 
(...) Only if the computer will violate patent, copyright, and other intellectual property laws. :( (...) Just wear thick shoes -- those studded decks can *hurt*! :) Steve -- More tiles! I must have more tiles! (25 years ago, 31-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

24 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR