Subject:
|
Re: Update news on BrickShelf.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Jul 2007 04:57:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5685 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Leonard Hoffman wrote:
| |
In lugnet.general, John Neal wrote:
| |
People only felt “betrayed” because they were too dumb not to have backed up
their own content.
|
(emphasis added)
A slight correction: many of us felt upset because being denied to other
people’s content. I don’t use BrickShelf to store my photos online, I use
it to keep track of all the amazing MOCs out there. Are you suggesting I am
“dumb” for not downloading each and every photo that has inspired or amazed
me over the past six years?!?!
|
No. But I’m struggling with the term “betrayed”. People felt understandably
upset about losing a wonderful resource like Brickshelf, but the only way I
could make sense of that word would be in the context in which I spoke.
| |
Now, despite feeling upset, it did make me realize how important Bshelf is.
I’m signing up for the $60 a month to show that even if Kevin one day decides
to stop his involvement, he’ll know to hand it over to someone else.
BrickShelf is too important to lose.
|
No disagreement here.
JOHN
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Update news on BrickShelf.com
|
| (...) (emphasis added) A slight correction: many of us felt upset because being denied to other people's content. I don't use BrickShelf to store my photos online, I use it to keep track of all the amazing MOCs out there. Are you suggesting I am (...) (17 years ago, 22-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
