Subject:
|
Re: Update news on BrickShelf.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 21 Jul 2007 02:30:05 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
5310 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Tony Kilaras wrote:
> Even if we assume that the above scenario materializes, at $5/month how much
> would you really lose? This discussion is getting a little ridiculous.
I have never said anything about the money aspect. The amount is a little high
when Flickr allows unlimited use for $25/yr but that is not the main problem.
The only thing clear is that this person cannot be trusted with such a crucial
role in the AFOL world.
What is ridiculous is that any AFOL would ever trust this person with their
images again, let alone PAY for the privilege of watching their images held to
ransom next time he wants to make a point.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Update news on BrickShelf.com
|
| (...) The ingratitude is staggering, Ted. That "crucial role" was created by that person. Brickshelf, the institution, is what it is today because of Kevin's generosity and commitment to it for the past ten years. (...) That spurious comment would (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Update news on BrickShelf.com
|
| "Tedward" <tgodwin@victoriaSPA...OCK.tc.ca> wrote in message news:JLHGzI.o6C@lugnet.com... (...) That Brickshelf is unique, needed and valuable, but it costs money to run. Hopefully, we learned something about of the how valuable Brickshelf is to (...) (17 years ago, 21-Jul-07, to lugnet.general)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
