Subject:
|
Re: Update news on BrickShelf.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sun, 22 Jul 2007 04:26:38 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5897 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, John Neal wrote:
| |
People only felt “betrayed” because they were too dumb not to have backed up
their own content.
|
(emphasis added)
A slight correction: many of us felt upset because being denied to other
people’s content. I don’t use BrickShelf to store my photos online, I use it
to keep track of all the amazing MOCs out there. Are you suggesting I am “dumb”
for not downloading each and every photo that has inspired or amazed me over the
past six years?!?!
Now, despite feeling upset, it did make me realize how important Bshelf is. I’m
signing up for the $60 a month to show that even if Kevin one day decides to
stop his involvement, he’ll know to hand it over to someone else. BrickShelf is
too important to lose.
-Lenny
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Update news on BrickShelf.com
|
| (...) No. But I'm struggling with the term "betrayed". People felt understandably upset about losing a wonderful resource like Brickshelf, but the only way I could make sense of that word would be in the context in which I spoke. (...) No (...) (17 years ago, 22-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Update news on BrickShelf.com
|
| (...) I knew somebody would offer that argument. Sure, Brickshelf depends upon content, but if Brickshelf weren't around, that content would be scattered across the net, unseen by most. "Merely providing the real estate" Are you serious!? That (...) (17 years ago, 22-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
51 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
