Subject:
|
Re: www.legoideas.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 22 Jan 2005 01:01:59 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2249 times
|
| |
|
|
Agreed. I MUCH prefer the older tub.
But I use the new tubs for static storage, and my 200 or so old tubs for when I need
to move something.
But I need MORE tubs ;-)
Larry Pieniazek wrote:
> In lugnet.general, Thomas Stangl wrote:
> > You know, I can understand not using tubs for the smaller sets, but it sure
> > would have been nice to see the 4421 in a tub.
> >
> > Then again, continuity of the series might be lost if one were in a tub while
> > others were in boxes...
> >
> > I know! Put them ALL in tubs! ;-)
>
> I'd rather pay less for the package and have more of my money go to the brick.
> The new tub with the studs is not really a very good tub compared to the old one
> with the flat lid... it takes up a lot more space and doesn't travel nearly as
> well.
--
Tom Stangl
*http://www.vfaq.com/
*DSM Visual FAQ home
*http://www.vfaq.net/
*Prius Visual FAQ Home
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: www.legoideas.com
|
| (...) I'd rather pay less for the package and have more of my money go to the brick. The new tub with the studs is not really a very good tub compared to the old one with the flat lid... it takes up a lot more space and doesn't travel nearly as (...) (22 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
