Subject:
|
Re: www.legoideas.com
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 21 Jan 2005 23:23:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
612 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Thomas Stangl wrote:
> You know, I can understand not using tubs for the smaller sets, but it sure
> would have been nice to see the 4421 in a tub.
>
> Then again, continuity of the series might be lost if one were in a tub while
> others were in boxes...
>
> I know! Put them ALL in tubs! ;-)
I'd rather pay less for the package and have more of my money go to the brick.
The new tub with the studs is not really a very good tub compared to the old one
with the flat lid... it takes up a lot more space and doesn't travel nearly as
well.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: www.legoideas.com
|
| Agreed. I MUCH prefer the older tub. But I use the new tubs for static storage, and my 200 or so old tubs for when I need to move something. But I need MORE tubs ;-) (...) -- Tom Stangl *(URL) Visual FAQ home *(URL) Visual FAQ Home (19 years ago, 22-Jan-05, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: www.legoideas.com
|
| You know, I can understand not using tubs for the smaller sets, but it sure would have been nice to see the 4421 in a tub. Then again, continuity of the series might be lost if one were in a tub while others were in boxes... I know! Put them ALL in (...) (19 years ago, 21-Jan-05, to lugnet.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
