 | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Mark Riley
|
| | | (...) The U.S. Navy has apparently decommissioned all of its battleships: (URL) any other navies have battleships, or is the battleship pretty much obsolete nowadays? Mark Note: Still no generic lugnet.off-topic group to send this to... :-( (20 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Ahui Herrera
|
| | | | | (...) Mark there are NO more battleships in any navy in the world the last time I checked. The aircraft carrier replaced the battleship as the "main ship-of-war" in modern navies of the world. The only battleships you can still see/get on are those (...) (20 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) True. But the Soviets (and now the Russians) might disagree; the Kirov and her sisters? are sometimes classed as "battleships" or "battlecruisers." We in the US more often call them "very heavy cruisers" or "command ships." all best LFB (20 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Steve Hickman
|
| | | | | | (...) Well actually, Russian/Soviet classifications of warships were slightly skewed to gain a 'numerical' superiority over the United States Navy. By announcing the construction of a battleship/battlecruiser, they could claim a superiority in (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) But this is the US naval classification system (or perhaps Jane's)--and it is therefore that also used by those of us operating in retrospect. Remember that German battleships and battlecruisers in WWI (and in WWII--Scharnhorst and Gneisenau (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Steve Hickman
|
| | | | | | (...) Very true. But, even the Germans considered the Gneisenau and Scharnhorst something called 'Pocket Battleships.' This was a peculiar way to present a ship that was greatly outclassed by BBs and BCs. The Germans could thus claim Naval equality (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) The "pocket battleships" (literally Panzerschiffen, or armor-clads) you're thinking of were Deutschland (later Lützow), Admiral Graf Spee (of the River Plate, and which a private company is talking about raising and restoring (!!!!)), and (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Steve Hickman
|
| | | | | | (...) Doh! Right you are! My mistake. The Gneisenau and Scharnhorst were definitely of the battle cruiser type vessel, in that they were built in response to the Invincibles and later Indefatigables. Interestingly, the Germans never really fully (...) (20 years ago, 24-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) I think they did actually use Schlachtkreuzer at some point-- Breyer at least suggests that they did, but you do see Panzerkreuzer and Grosser Kreuzer used as well. (Imagine the s-tsett there, I cannot remember the ANSI number for it.) But it (...) (20 years ago, 25-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Lego seems to be copying Mega Blocks —David Laswell
|
| | | | (...) They didn't have much choice in the matter. The main guns have to be fed ammo in a specific sequence to compensate for changes in gun barrel geometry due to heat from firing the previous round(s). Rumor is that they've just been working (...) (20 years ago, 23-May-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| | | | |
