 | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) <and a bunch more witnessing> Please consider setting FUT somewhere else, it's starting to veer away from general interest, IMHO. I set FUT to ot.d but that may not be the right place to be, I dunno. (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community) —David Schwanke
|
| | | | | I'm too newb to know what FUT is so if someone wants to enlighten me I'll make any adjustments that I can. We already briefly had the discussion about the locations of these discussions and it was generally sugested that lugnet.people and (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) Heh. That used to mess me up, too. It means that you will tag your message to send Follow-Ups To another posting group. (...) In fairness to the readship, it's not yet a debate because you haven't yet moved to off-topic.debate. (...) It's a (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —Maggie Cambron
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm not as compartmentalized a dork here as some, but with every post I read in this thread I only restrain myself from saying "take it to ot.debate" for the same reason given to you by others and by Dave! (...) The whole thing does belong (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | | (...) Abednego, I think. When I was a kid, I was taught a little mnemonic; "shake the bed, make the bed, and to bed we go." Innocent then, but now I think it could have other implications ;') The Rev. might get a kick out of that one... I wonder (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) .debate doesn't suffer fools gladly, no. If you just waltz in there and tell people you have some Good News for them, you're not likely to get a warm reception. (...) and some silliness, and you have the common sense to tell which is which, (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —David Schwanke
|
| | | | | | Well. I am not looking for a big heavy discussion. If the participants arent going to be friendly then I am not intersted and that is the general vibe that I hear about it. I am also not interested in deep theological discusions. I didnt come here (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —David Schwanke
|
| | | | | | Ohh, that was "you guys" not you specifically. Didnt mean to aim that at one person. :) Also wanted to mention as i am sure it will come up.. I am not worried about the defensability of my faith. I have no 'need' to defend it. Christ can defend (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.people, lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Just for the record, that's more of an honorary appellation than a formal title of office. Dave! (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —Richard Marchetti
|
| | | | | | (...) I motion we create the office of "The Pudd'nHead Dave!" -- it's much more vulgar that way. Don't forget the use of the definite article in the formal title. -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) "Abenib... Abeb... Adeni... "I'm Ben" :) Steve (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | (...) I need to watch more veggies, I'm gettin rusty. -Tim (the pirate who doesn't do anything) (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Veggie Tales!! Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. —David Koudys
|
| | | | (...) Josh and the Giant Wall was the best outta all of 'em. Anything that infers Holy Grail gets my vote! Dave K (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Veggie Tales!! Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | (...) Oh yeah! My favorite characters are the French Peas - I mean, Freedom Peas ;-) Won't you join me in my irritating little song? -Tim (21 years ago, 14-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Veggie Tales!! Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. —Steve Bliss
|
| | | | (...) I think _Rack, Shak, and Benny_ (sp?) will always be my favorite. But the Monty Python references in _Josh and the Big Wall_ are wonderful. Gotta love the French Peas; "Zhjane! Stops zees crrrazy t'ing!" Steve (21 years ago, 25-May-03, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | |
