Subject:
|
Re: Understanding Leaks
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 20:10:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
613 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Mark D. McKean writes:
> I think this is an interesting point, and it wouldn't surprise me if
> there were some truth to this idea. TLC knows that Lugnetters, by
> nature, will (1) seek out any info they can find on upcoming sets, and
> (2) thoroughly, mercilessly criticize them, sometimes describing in
> agonizing detail what may be wrong with them (see the thread on
> lugnet.technic about the green fire truck for an example of that). I
> wouldn't blame them for trying to tap us as an inexpensive focus group.
>
> However, if they really are using us to avoid paying for a focus group,
> the least they owe us is to let us do it knowingly. We're already doing
> the work, after all; we devote large amounts of our time and money to
> this hobby. Just be open with us about picking our brains.
Nope. Not doing that at all. No intentional leaks.
Jake
---
Jake McKee
Senior Producer
LEGO Direct
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) As much as I believe you Jake (especially considering the official stance that TLC does market studies based on its much larger child market and not AFOLs), you gotta be careful with such responses. The conspiracy theorists could have a field (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Understanding Leaks
|
| (...) I think this is an interesting point, and it wouldn't surprise me if there were some truth to this idea. TLC knows that Lugnetters, by nature, will (1) seek out any info they can find on upcoming sets, and (2) thoroughly, mercilessly criticize (...) (21 years ago, 8-Jan-03, to lugnet.general)
|
20 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
