|
In lugnet.general, Anthony Sava writes:
> It was said before in another thread, but I believe it is a good point to make
> so I'll say it. If LEGO had introduced 'Minifigs of color' along side yellow
> minifigs, instead of the new caucasian lego color, then LEGO would be
> proclaiming that the yellow minifigs that were previously produced would be
> considered caucasian.
>
> And if all yellow minifigs were considered caucasian, then LEGO could be
> accused of discriminating against non caucasian people, and that would be bad.
And I'm sure I've said this before, but I don't buy this slippery slope.
Yellow has been used to represent generic non-white peoples in the past.
It's just my opinion that it is incapable of representing black people.
(Someone once used the Simpsons as an example, and I don't think there are
hordes of people accusing them of discrimination.)
Back to these so-called 'figs, has anyone else looked at the legs and
thought they looked suspiciously one-piece? Scary...
Michael Dallaston
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
13 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|