 | | Re: Bulk Bricks, Plates at S@H
|
| (...) Ah, you know what it is? They have ingeniously forgotten to make the site Opera compatible. The whole "Browse the Shop" and "Browse By" menus do not work in Opera. I almost hate to mention, why do their work for them? Sheesh, Bricklink is so (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)
| | | | | shop.lego.com Broken
|
| (...) Wow, that's amazing. I guess I've become too Galeon-dependent---I can't remember the last time I even looked as shop.lego.com from the Windows side. Kudos to the lego.com Web team---browsing (at least for the United States) is no longer (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
| (...) Yes, but what percentage of the General Public (i.e. Parents) use Galeon or Opera?? I think it is a case of both of you not being members of the Primary Target Market group. Paul Sinasohn LUGNET #115 (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
| (...) I can't believe you wrote that -- you're basically defending bad code / bad design. There is no reason for a simple left nav to bomb in ANY browser. And while I haven't investigated why it doesn't work (not my job), everything that I saw in (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
| "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0rpsE.LM2@lugnet.com... (...) or (...) bad (...) while (...) javascript, (...) variety (...) right? (...) Communicator (...) Well speaking as a web developer (and quite a few people on (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
| | | | | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
| (...) I don't see this as being that kind of issue -- we are talking about a simple left navigation device. 60% of one's time? Just do it right the first time and keep reusing the code. Lugnet, Bricklink, eBay, Amazon, bluelight, target, cdnow, etc. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
| (...) Lego.com is a site which sells Lego. If the extra 5% of users can pay for the extra development costs and return a decent margin the answer is "YES". It is all about costs and benefits. Scott A (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
| "richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0s2zn.7z@lugnet.com... (...) basic... (...) OK I agree fully that the navigation is the one item you need to make sure is working throughout. a simple link to a html only version would (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
