 | | Re: Bulk Bricks, Plates at S@H
|
|
(...) Is this a joke? Finding the bulk listings has become almost impossible on Lego.com. Amongst the 45 bulk offerings are small sets that do not qualify as any kind of bulk. The price for common bricks remains higher from S@H than from sellers on (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Bricks, Plates at S@H
|
|
(...) Huh? It used to be really hard---you had to go through page after page of randomly jumbled parts packs. Now you just go to "Accessories And" in the menu bar (which admittedly, and for no discernable reason, only works when Javascript is turned (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Bricks, Plates at S@H
|
|
(...) I guess that depends on your definition of "common". With S@H, White 2x2 tiles are common. I have roughly 3000 of them, purchased over the last couple years. Try doing that through Bricklink without accumulating $$$ in shipping from a few (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Bricks, Plates at S@H
|
|
(...) Ah, you know what it is? They have ingeniously forgotten to make the site Opera compatible. The whole "Browse the Shop" and "Browse By" menus do not work in Opera. I almost hate to mention, why do their work for them? Sheesh, Bricklink is so (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
(...) Wow, that's amazing. I guess I've become too Galeon-dependent---I can't remember the last time I even looked as shop.lego.com from the Windows side. Kudos to the lego.com Web team---browsing (at least for the United States) is no longer (...) (22 years ago, 12-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
(...) Yes, but what percentage of the General Public (i.e. Parents) use Galeon or Opera?? I think it is a case of both of you not being members of the Primary Target Market group. Paul Sinasohn LUGNET #115 (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
(...) I can't believe you wrote that -- you're basically defending bad code / bad design. There is no reason for a simple left nav to bomb in ANY browser. And while I haven't investigated why it doesn't work (not my job), everything that I saw in (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0rpsE.LM2@lugnet.com... (...) or (...) bad (...) while (...) javascript, (...) variety (...) right? (...) Communicator (...) Well speaking as a web developer (and quite a few people on (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.lego.direct)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
(...) I don't see this as being that kind of issue -- we are talking about a simple left navigation device. 60% of one's time? Just do it right the first time and keep reusing the code. Lugnet, Bricklink, eBay, Amazon, bluelight, target, cdnow, etc. (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
(...) Lego.com is a site which sells Lego. If the extra 5% of users can pay for the extra development costs and return a decent margin the answer is "YES". It is all about costs and benefits. Scott A (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: shop.lego.com Broken
|
|
"richard marchetti" <blueofnoon@aol.com> wrote in message news:H0s2zn.7z@lugnet.com... (...) basic... (...) OK I agree fully that the navigation is the one item you need to make sure is working throughout. a simple link to a html only version would (...) (22 years ago, 13-Aug-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
