Subject:
|
Re: Should there be a set size for Brickshelf pics?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 04:12:16 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
323 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, David VinZant writes:
> So my main qustion is, what resolution do most people view the site at,
> 1024x768, 800x600, or smaller? And do you think people should stick to a
> certain resolution or do you care that much about hitting the scroll bar?
I'm always at 1024x768. Any larger and it seems to me like those large
print books for people with failing eyesight.
I don't mind scrolling up and down at all because I've got the little scroll
wheel on my mouse, so it is pretty effortless. Side to side is sometimes
annoying. More annoying by far is when the picture is huge but still poor
quality. But it's not like we can really regulate the kind of camera (and
steadiness of hand). If the picture is large and crisp quality I love it as
it lets you look at building details.
I generally try and stay smaller, myself, though, because I crop photos down
for my own website, and those are the photos I upload to Brickshelf.
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Should there be a set size for Brickshelf pics?
|
| I want to bring this up because I find that some of pictures on Brickshelf tend to be very large. Now I am sure I am guilty of this as well. Because on my PC I have my resolution at 1024x768. But sometimes I run into pictures that are a greater (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
