Subject:
|
Re: Should there be a set size for Brickshelf pics?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 7 Jun 2002 00:45:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
397 times
|
| |
|
|
> Personally I think that 640x480 should be the default image size. I
> usually view Brickshelf when I'm on an 800x600 screen, and you gotta
> have room for the other parts of the page. (Which reminds me,
> something that's bugged me for years is the fact taht the "Next"
> button is more than 800 pixels from the left edge. In fact, there's a
> <TABLE WIDTH=840> tag in play which means no matter how small the
> image, I have to scroll to the right.
I am often using a small screen laptop with a terrible trackpad (instead of a
mouse) and this next-off-the-edge drives me absolutely crazy!!!
My workaround to this problem is, when entering a folder, click on the last
image in the folder and then use the Previous link (which is on screen) to go
backwards through the images. For most folders of people's pics, the order
isn't important, but it's no use whatsoever for viewing instruction scans!
Kerry
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Should there be a set size for Brickshelf pics?
|
| (...) usually view Brickshelf when I'm on an 800x600 screen, and you gotta have room for the other parts of the page. (Which reminds me, something that's bugged me for years is the fact taht the "Next" button is more than 800 pixels from the left (...) (22 years ago, 6-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
