Subject:
|
Re: 4 x 4 x 2 cone question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 6 Jun 2002 05:09:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
760 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Jonathan Wilson writes:
> I have 2 different versions of this part, one with an axlehole and one
> without. Can anyone shed any light on which one was used where/when?
I'm almost certain that the older ones are without the axlehole. I have a
number of them off a Galaxy Explorer which doesn't have them. I assume
similar sets in that era don't have them either.
Calum
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | 4 x 4 x 2 cone question
|
| I have 2 different versions of this part, one with an axlehole and one without. Can anyone shed any light on which one was used where/when? (22 years ago, 4-Jun-02, to lugnet.general)
|
2 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
