 | | Brickshelf Pic —Dave Johann
|
| | | (...) I was wondering the same thing myself. Things like this should not be on Brickshelf. -Dave (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf Pic —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) And the best way (1) to deal with them is to very quietly drop a note to Kevin Loch about it. He's fast at fixing those sorts of things, the pic would be gone and the user banned in a jiffy. 1 - Of course when I say "best way" what I mean is (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf Pic —Dave Johann
|
| | | | | (...) I agree. This is why I shot off a note to Kevin as soon as I spotted this. I replied here simply because my email has been mildly flakey, so Kevin might not have gotten it and this is the second-best solution for contacting him AFAIAC. As I (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.general)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | ? —Richard Noeckel
|
| | | | Some answers to your questions; Why general: because I posted a general question. Why post the link: because by saying that there’s an issue in Brickshelf would cause people to flood over there to see what's amiss. (By saying there’s a fire in (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ? —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | (...) A simple "How do I contact the Brickshelf administrator?" would have produced the required information fairly swiftly. And discussing the "Why?" belongs much better here in .debate. ROSCO (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) That raises a good point. The logical place to look for contact info specific to a site is typically the site's "front door", in this case www.brickshelf.com (contrast with LUGNET(tm) which has a clear way to contact admins on the front (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ? —Benjamin Medinets
|
| | | | | (...) Well, it looks like problem solved...but you are right (and not trying to compound the issue by "slapping richards hand", as several hands already did) I totally agree with Lar on the info at hand....sure there was a problem that needed to be (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Q Re: ? —Tim Courtney
|
| | | | | | "Benjamin Medinets" <bmedinets@excite.com> wrote in message news:GruEy2.EHG@lugnet.com... (...) Yeah. The whole thing is a tricky situation, lets let that part of it die and work to come to an agreement on how to effectively deal with situations (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ? — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | (...) Good point, indeed. Last night I sent mail to Kevin about this image URL. Even I first went to the brickshelf homepage, didn't see a mail address, and took one from a post he made here a couple days ago. The message bounced! [1] (...) Doh! (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: ? —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Excellent! May I suggest that if he's willing, a group to discuss Brickshelf(tm) might be a good idea too. Not sure where to slot it in the hierarchy though. Discussion about Brickshelf seems to happen in various places now (.publish, (...) (23 years ago, 20-Feb-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
