 | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) Hmm... tempting. Na, 100 bucks isn't enough comp to lose the rights to one of my designs. ++Lar (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) Yeah, I would be nice if one did not have to give up the copyright for one's design. Additionally, I am guessing that this phrase is fairly standard, but the fine print says, "Winners assume all liability for any injury or damage caused, or (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| Well seing i am the only 12 year old who actually builds trains for shows, i think i would have a good chance for the 7-12 age group. I highly doubt there are any 12 year olds out there that are as good as people here including me ! (...) Maybe we (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) Whew. Well for a sec there I thought I wouldn't be able to enter my "poke your eye out with a sharp stick flatcar load"... (...) Based on what we've seen in the mania magazines, I suspect the answer would be "potentially quite a bit". ++Lar (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| Or go the high road and make an "Operation Lifesaver" boxcar. see: (URL) Larry, you just don't want to loose agaisnt me in the over 30 group! ;D SteveB (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) I find this phrase pretty funny. You surrender all rights to your design, yet you are still responsible for it for any damages that may be incurred. I wonder if that flies in court? I assume it's to cover instances where someone submits a (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) You're right, I don't want to be loose against you, too much chance of damage, I have a lot of parts that might break off. But I'm not worried about losing against you in the over 30 group, since there isn't one. There's just an 18+ one, and (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) You miss the point. 1. It's an honor which is worth more than money can buy. 2. Maybe it's 100 bucks *at their price* for bricks.... (goes a looong way) 2. Here's a chance to design a set that has *great parts* in it-- think of it as an (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) <butts in> No way! Even though I don't own *any* train sets, look out for the Raw Material Shifter in the 13-17 category. I don't really think I need those unimportant pieces like wheels or track.. I've found a way around them. (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) I wonder if thats how 4561 was created :) (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) I'm not yet convinced it's an honor to have TLC turn my design into something weird and unrecognisable... their track record points to that. (...) Previous practice with prizes has been at MSRP. (...) I think this is supposed to be point 3 (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) I went to the employee's shop in Billund and the employees can buy sets for the same price shops buy, I don't think they are going to sell sets cheaper. So the money is not going to make it worth. (...) Maybe the entries can show TLC that we (...) (24 years ago, 30-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| "Kyle D. Jackson" <flightdeck@sympatic...mblock.ca> wrote in message news:G6Dr9K.B5y@lugnet.com... (...) one's (...) but the (...) caused, (...) redemption (...) What would probably happen is that TLC would work it out with the original owner and (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| "Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:G6EDsy.3GH@lugnet.com... (...) [ ... snipped ... ] (...) I (...) published. (...) others) (...) of (...) wins (...) [ ... snipped ... ] My guess is that the winning design(s) will (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) If lego did that to one of its loyal fans i would put all my legos on the street, pour gasoline on it, lite it on fire, video tape it and send the tape to lego and post the video on the web, if it did that. kai (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) Interesting... So all non-winning entrants get to retain full rights to their designs? That I didn't expect. KDJ ___...___ LUGNETer #203, Windsor, Ontario, Canada (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| "kai brodersen" <cbrodersen@mediaone.net> wrote in message news:G6ExxI.Hst@lugnet.com... (...) original (...) licensing (...) damages (...) the (...) Why? If I stole your design and submitted it to an TLG contest and won, wouldn't you be upset? If (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| In lugnet.general, Mike Faunce writes: <snip> (...) I don't usually post "I agree" posts but, I agree. While I am not happy about loss of rights if I'm the originator, it is nice to see that maybe TLC is going to do something about the cases where (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) If you look where i posted my message it was after he said "then send you the bill for the resulting costs (legal +licensing that they worked out with the original owner) and then sue you for damages and fraud if you didn't cough up the (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| (...) Ummm...I believe the term "you" refers to the thief who submitted someone else's work as their own. As in: If YOU steal my work and I sue Lego it is perfectly reasonable for Lego to in turn expect YOU (the thief) to reimburse them for any (...) (24 years ago, 31-Dec-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| Christopher Masi wrote: <snip> (...) The first thing that came to my mind when I saw the ad for this contest was that it was a good way for LEGO to judge the interest in making a new train line like the one that has been discussed here and on (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| Do you have to have a subscription to the lego club to get this, i havent yet.. (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| kai brodersen <cbrodersen@mediaone.net> wrote in message news:G6GooI.C4t@lugnet.com... (...) yet.. I think it just comes in the latest (January) Shop At Home catalog. If you aren't subscribed to their Shop At Home mailing list, call (800)453-4677 (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| If they want ideas, I think they should look at Brian Williams site!!! and look at (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: New S@H Catalog
|
| Mookie <Mookie1@telocity.com> wrote in message news:3A50AF77.393534...ity.com... (...) look at (...) That reminds me I should try to run over to his place while I'm still in Chicago. I've been meaning to for quite some time, hopefully he has his (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
| |
