 | | Re: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces) —James Brown
|
| | | (...) I don't know about this specific situation (not being at my home e-mail, I don't know if I got this iteration of UCE), but I tend to side with Jeremy on this issue. However, it's probably relevant to point out that I'm a rabid opponent of (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.auction)
|
| | | |
| | | | | sale and auction advertisements (was: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces)) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | (...) I would like to avoid that kind of bad feeling. When my auction is over, I send out one big email to the winners with the total winnings listed out. If I included a clause something like "I normally would add your email address to my auction (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: sale and auction advertisements (was: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces)) —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | (...) It would in my case. I appreciate that sort of consideration, and it tends to nudge someone up a few notches in my brain. Even better would be "If you want to be on my list, please..." - but I appreciate that that would impact the (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: sale and auction adverts —Clark Stephens
|
| | | | | | Chris, What you describe is an "opt-out" list, which means the buyer has to do something to be removed from the list. That kind of list can generate the same ill-will already expressed about mailing lists. A better choice is an "opt-in" list, which (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) I find myself particularly leniant with these spams, sadly... I don't agree with the fact that they're spams, but at least they're really not dished out at complete random (i.e. you know your recipient at least has a chance of being (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.market.auction, lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Well, this is a debatable point, I guess. *Should* you be hostile? Jeremy is, and that's fine for him. I'm not. I don't think you should feel guilty that you're not hostile enough. If you see what I mean. (...) (YCLIU, but... ) Your Mileage (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces) —David Eaton
|
| | | | (...) Well, it's not that I feel guilty for not feeling hostile... it's that I feel if I concede to these spams, I feel as though I haven't a leg to stand on when disliking other spams. It's the more or less prejudiced opinion that these spams are (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) I'm in the "mildly dislike opt out of AFOL mailing lists but don't mind it that much" camp so my answer is tainted, I guess. But for me it's not a hard dilemma... I can tell a note from an AFOL from a robot spam pretty easily. Robot SPAM gets (...) (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Beware more SPAM from Andreas Stabno (Was: KC Masterpieces) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Not only that, but in your case, you have an open offer to buy "out there." So you would have a weaker claim to outrage than some others, IMHO. Chris (24 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| | | | |
