Subject:
|
Re: Lost Instructions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Apr 2000 04:25:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1387 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes:
> On the one hand I agree with you. On the other hand, I see no reason to
> not discuss TLC's policy. There is no reason to shut down discussion
> just because Kevin Loch has made a final decision (I would also hope
> that his decision is flexible if it becomes apparent that there is not a
> legal issue - though he may still chose to continue to not include
> current sets, but then in that case, we also should consider supporting
> someone else who decides to put up a different web site).
Right!
So does anyone have official information about TLC's policy regarding this?
Kevin, do you mind sharing whatever info you were given by TLC lawyers (or
anyone else) that made you originally arrive at this decision?
-Shiri
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lost Instructions
|
| (...) On the one hand I agree with you. On the other hand, I see no reason to not discuss TLC's policy. There is no reason to shut down discussion just because Kevin Loch has made a final decision (I would also hope that his decision is flexible if (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
