Subject:
|
Re: Lost Instructions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Apr 2000 03:38:01 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
2500 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Frank Filz writes:
> Kevin Salm wrote:
> >
> > Kevin Loch has told us repeatedly that his policy of not posting
> > instructions for
> > currently-available sets is not something he is ready to change. I am okay
> > with that. It may inconvenience me sometimes, but I am okay with it.
> > On the larger scale, I am very thankful that someone like Kevin Loch has
> > taken the time, effort, and expense to post a very comprehensive and high
> > quality archive of past Lego set instructions and catalogs. Why he does
> > it and what rules or limits he sets for himself is his business.
> > Brickshelf is all we have right now for searching old set instructions and
> > catalogs. What would we all do if this site did not exist at all and no one
> > else cared to do what Kevin has done???
>
> On the one hand I agree with you. On the other hand, I see no reason to
> not discuss TLC's policy. There is no reason to shut down discussion
> just because Kevin Loch has made a final decision (I would also hope
> that his decision is flexible if it becomes apparent that there is not a
> legal issue - though he may still chose to continue to not include
> current sets, but then in that case, we also should consider supporting
> someone else who decides to put up a different web site).
> --Frank Filz
I somewhat agree with you. The reason I have for not discussing this further
is that there is no need until Kevin Loch indicates that he wants input from
others and is considering changing his own policy.
I agree totally with supporting someone else for a different web site. This I
am happy to discuss. As for support: I think discussing financial support can
also be important for the good of all of us. I do not believe that Kevin Loch
has ever asked for a dime from any of us no matter how much we use his website
resources. If anything, his time and effort are worth some monetary value.
__Kevin Salm__
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Lost Instructions
|
| (...) On the one hand I agree with you. On the other hand, I see no reason to not discuss TLC's policy. There is no reason to shut down discussion just because Kevin Loch has made a final decision (I would also hope that his decision is flexible if (...) (26 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
