Subject:
|
Re: Lost Instructions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 14 Apr 2000 03:07:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1140 times
|
| |
|
|
What is your policy? a 2 year or 3 year ban? You're web site says no scans
newer than 1997, but I thought your policy was a 2 year ban, which would
make 1998 sets ok.
Kevin Loch wrote in message ...
> This is very interesting. My current policy stands, however,
> if TLC explicitly asked me to include current instructions, I would • probably
> accomodate their request.
>
> KL
>
> In lugnet.general, Benjamin Whytcross writes:
> > When I phoned LA, I was told that LEGO rad no problems with current set
> > instructions on the web. Kevin, on the other hand, doesn't include them on
> > his page, as the ability to get the instructions on-line may stop people
> > buying the current sets [after all, why buy a set if you already have the
> > parts/don't see any parts in the instructions to make it worth buying]
> >
> > [At least that's what I thought the reason was]
> >
> > Benjamin Whytcross
> >
> > bwhytcro@pacificaccess.com.au
> >
> > Growing older is compulsary..Growing up isn't :-)
> >
> > > From: Dave Johann
> > >
> > > > If it were an older set, I'd suggest you go to • brickshelf.com, where many
> > > > instructions are collected by Kevin Loch. However, there are • no instructions
> > > > there for sets that were released after 1997... Sorry... :-\
> > > >
> > > > -Shiri
> > >
> > > That begs the question: why not? Why aren't there any
> > > instructions for newer
> > > sets? Is it a legal problem or have people just not scanned
> > > any? Why am I
> > > asking? sheer curiosity.....
> > >
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Lost Instructions
|
| (...) No. His policy is just: no newer sets than 1997, period. I wish he'd change his mind, but this is just grinding the flour (1). Kevin stated multiple times that his policy stands, and he won't change it. It's just best to let go now - nothing (...) (25 years ago, 14-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Lost Instructions
|
| This is very interesting. My current policy stands, however, if TLC explicitly asked me to include current instructions, I would probably accomodate their request. KL (...) (25 years ago, 13-Apr-00, to lugnet.general)
|
16 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
