To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.generalOpen lugnet.general in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 General / 13034
13033  |  13035
Subject: 
Re: Conversation at TRU overheard
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.general
Date: 
Mon, 3 Jan 2000 15:00:46 GMT
Viewed: 
715 times
  
In lugnet.general, Mike Walsh wrote:

So, net-net, when I buy for him I typically look at the size of the model
not the age on the box.  He  is pretty good for 100-150 pieces typically.
We'll see how the Artic sets go - he has seen them and really wants them.  I
plan on getting him the 6573 Artic Expedition
(http://www.lugnet.com/pause/search/?query=6573) for his birthday in a few
weeks.  I know he will be able to build this one, but the crawler tracks are
a must have for him!

Hmm.  Maybe that's the real reason for juniorization -- kids (and parents) want
the impressive big sets, (most) kids don't really want to spend that much time
building.  So LEGO makes big sets with fewer, bigger parts.

That doesn't explain the *small* juniorized sets.

And it doesn't help those who actually buy a building toy with the expectation
that they'll be spending time building.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Conversation at TRU overheard
 
Mookie wrote in message <386C4D25.44310EA7@w...tt.net>... (...) I had a similar experience at Zany-Brainy just before Christmas although it was with a grandmother buying a present for one of her grandchildren (who was not with her). Her grandson (...) (25 years ago, 31-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)

12 Messages in This Thread:







Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR