Subject:
|
Correction/Apology (was Re: New 2000 sets in Lego.com European catalog!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Thu, 16 Dec 1999 06:03:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
9773 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Richard Finegold writes:
> In lugnet.announce, Richard Finegold writes:
> > I was looking at the <http://www.lego.com/> official LEGO web site and • checked
> > to see if any catalog entries had been updated. Sure enough, there were
> [snip]
>
> I hate to followup my own message, but I just want to point out that these
> were discovered nearly the same way that set 1886 got into the Pause list.
> See http://www.lugnet.com/general/?n=11282
Here I am, following up my own message again.
In this message (above) I sleepily said that these numbers were discovered
by using the URL above. This was incorrect, as mentioned in
http://www.lugnet.com/admin/general/?n=3492 posted later (too late?!) the
same day. The proper reply is that there should've been a paragraph break
after the exclamation mark.
Therefore, I hereby invite cancellation of the message
(http://www.lugnet.com/general/?n=11705) if it might similarly confuse
others (although hopefully it's a dead horse issue). Todd, Suzanne, et al,
I respect your judgement.
I apologize to everyone for much wasted time and any other life-shortening
experiences. I also apologize for not posting this refutation in the proper
place sooner and for not setting the record straight more intelligently.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
