 | | BrickNebula PodCast #6: Sun Stroke
|
|
I am pleased to announce the (URL) BrickNebula> PodCast, (URL) Episode 6: Sun Stroke> In our latest podcast, we both suffer from sun stroke... Oh, and we ramble on about LEGO deals... and a few other things before our Skype connection disintegrates (...) (21 years ago, 16-Jun-05, to lugnet.space, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.loc.us.oh, lugnet.loc.us.oh.col, FTX)
|
| |
| | The future of Lugnet
|
|
Hey all, LOTS o' posts here and many other places in recent months about the future (or demise depending on the POV of the poster!) of Lugnet. I simply can't imagine Lugnet going away. It just doesn't seem possible or likely to me. While it's true (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: AoJT3: Johnny Thunder and the King of the Gypsies (Update June 10)
|
|
Thought you all could do with another update: (URL) whole gypsy-sational story: (URL) Steve (21 years ago, 15-Jun-05, to lugnet.adventurers, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New "Things"
|
|
(...) If I want the new "Things" to be found easily, I put them on the first page. If I want people to have a little bit of a challange, I upload them alphabetically and then they appear where ever in the folder pages. Like 52 pick up. (...) -snip- (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New "Things"
|
|
(...) Start a new folder, I suppose. Maybe I should have started with "z99"; I would be able to fit 2574 pictures before I have to worry. ~Kevoh (21 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | We have an ISD winner!
|
|
Greetings from the LEGO Fan group again! Lately we have been making quite a stir in the community, and we're not about to stop yet. Earlier this year, LEGOLAND California hosted a Star Wars® Weekend . Part of this event included 2 Imperial Star (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.general, lugnet.fun.community, FTX) !
|
| |
| | Re: New "Things"
|
|
(...) What are you planning on doing when you hit 100 files huh? Legoswami (21 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New "Things"
|
|
(...) Some neat stuff in there, but it is very aggravating trying to find the newer things. Might I suggest the Kevin Blocksidge Numbering System, as seen in (URL) this folder> and explained (URL) here>? (21 years ago, 14-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | New "Things"
|
|
See if you can find the new Things. (URL) Image as of this time has no View counts>> e (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
(...) Venkatesh, LUGNET is in the process of "future proofing" itself, so to speak. I'm in Boston having conversations with people and typing up potential directions for the site. Wiki integration is coming up often in my mind. Please contact me if (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
(...) [...] Hi, I agree Christian's point of view on the legowiki subject and hope being able to contribute in the near future. Didier (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
(...) Wikipedia is a generic encyclopedia. Terms like "SNOT" or "BURP" might be out of place there, as they are too specific. (...) Why not? > Or just information on (...) Well, it could be an organized form of the the information key postings on (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
(...) One more point that just popped into my head: External linking. As a Wiki can not and will not replace places like Peeron, a Lego Wiki would need a simple, but powerful way of linking to set and part references. I have not tried to set up a (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
(...) Hi, Gary, Two answers for this: 1. What is a Wiki? A Wiki is a kind of "web in a box". The people who provide content can easily create and edit pages with information, and can equally edit links between these. Think of it as an encyclopedia, (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
(...) Any of those names are fine by me as long as the engines find them, I guess I like BrickWiki (or WikiBricky, because it rhymes...) best... But I'm just a gadfly. (...) *Many* parts have never been implemented. WRT to a wiki, probably this one (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
What languages would people be interested in having at the start of the site? And are there people willing/able to translate between languages? Now about that name. I need to get a final name decided before the Wiki is launched, since it would be a (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Sets That Were Never Produced
|
|
(...) Gary, Ooops again. I think you meant to include this link to the later catalog (URL) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Legowiki
|
|
(...) Encyclopedic reference. No other site is like that. FAQs can come close if you're lucky but they don't have the cross linking, usually, as they are too much for one person to maintain. (...) If you don't know what a Wiki is, you may not be (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Lego Sets That Were Never Produced
|
|
(...) Ooops! I forgot to show what was probably produced in 1961-62. To do that, one has to look at the 1963 catalog (all these set versions with the same set numbers were actually first produced in 1961, with the exception of the tall box version (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Lego Sets That Were Never Produced
|
|
A while ago I mentioned that some early USA and Canada sets from 1961-62 were probably never produced. I think I can pretty much confirm it now. The 1961-62 USA and Canada Samsonite Lego catalogs show some pretty impressive sets: (URL) Here is the (...) (21 years ago, 12-Jun-05, to lugnet.general)
|
