 | | Re: notes within the set guides
|
|
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004 22:18:06 GMT, "Frank Filz" <ffilz-lists@mindspring.com> wrote: <snip> (...) </snip> Any non-offensive use is fine, but I wonder why people don't use the private notes field for their own administration... Duq (22 years ago, 6-Jun-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: mold variant: turntable 4 x 4
|
|
That's interesting. Thanks for pointing that out. Of course, I'll have to go and re-check mine. ;) e (22 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | mold variant: turntable 4 x 4
|
|
Recently I found another variant of the 4 x 4 turntable. (URL) The red, white and black turntable on the top row are all the dimpled versions. (used between 1969 and 1976, according to peeron) The white turntable on the bottom row is completely (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
| | HOT! Need your help in choosing...
|
|
Become part of history and vote on the new color for the next container ship.. The Maersk Container ship (set 10152) has been a huge success and will truly be a collector’s items. The limited quantity is nearly gone. Many community members have (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.lego, lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, lugnet.color, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: Unknown part: Brick 2 x 4 with hole
|
|
(...) Niels, You are correct. That is a system-size brick that was used in early Duplo sets. It had a rope attached that allowed the child to turn a Duplo wheeled base into a pull toy. Here's a pic of the part: (URL) part has recently been added to (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.duplo)
|
| |
| | Unknown part: Brick 2 x 4 with hole
|
|
Among a lot of 2nd hand lego from the seventies (ca 1971 - 1977, no older bricks) I found a red 2x4 brick with a small hole in the top. The hole looks perfect, so I don't think someone has drilled it in the brick. I could not find any reference (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jun-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: A request for everyone, regarding a pet peeve
|
|
(...) I've noticed on occassion that a new reply is disconnected from the previous thread (the original thread is still there, but the new post shows up as the start of a second thread), and I've long wondered if it had something to do with the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: notes within the set guides
|
|
"Josh Baakko" <josh@blockchoice.com> wrote in message news:Hyt0w3.15u@lugnet.com... (...) sets, (...) webspace (...) "Braging" (...) something (...) Since this is a feature only available to members, I don't see a problem with the members using the (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | notes within the set guides
|
|
I've noticed for some time that some people put some WASTEFUL notes about sets, for instance: (URL) the notes "MISB" or "##% off"... I've mostly wondered how much webspace these notes waste? I've been tracking some of mine down that were "Braging" (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.suggestions, lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: A request for everyone, regarding a pet peeve
|
|
(...) Just for reference, the problem that Ram is describing is wholly separate from what I'm talking about. His question seems to involve the expiration of parts of a thread, while I'm referring to the omission of source-links in follow-up posts. (...) (22 years ago, 4-Jun-04, to lugnet.general)
|
