 | | Re: how odd!!!!
|
|
(...) Those certainly are strange! My first thought is that they might be what some of my friends call "hand moulds". Apparently when Lego creates/gets a new mould, they test it in something other than a full-blown production machine. Probably at a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: LEGO Color Reference
|
|
(...) Hi Todd, I'd love to get a hold of the color .inc files you used, they look awesome! Could you make them available? I didn't see any posts in cad. Thanks, Gary (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.ray, lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
Hi Mike - Great comments! (...) Yep. I think it's not too cool when people are afraid to post constructive criticism. I think though, people only get upset at posters when they say something blatantly negative about a model - which discourages (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Just a few questions to liven up .harrypotter
|
|
Hi all, After my family and I bought and watched HP:COS, my sister and I asked each other a few questions regarding the movie. Here are some of them. Feel free to state yours. NOTE: I'm referring to the two movies, not the four books. 1) Who is your (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.harrypotter, lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) My personal feeling is that there are some unwritten rules that strongly *discourage* talking about a LEGO model that someone posts. I certainly have the impression that no matter how well-intentioned, if there is a single sentence in a (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) I definitely concur on that point. (...) On many points, I hear ya there. I'm trying to bring discussions about the community out in the open, since my efforts behind the scenes and in personal projects have not been successful - partially due (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Re: Lifetime of incandescent 9v LEGO lights?
|
|
(...) Well I have a 1x4 brick with 2 lights & one of the lights has stopped working. (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) From someone whose interest has waned... Lugnet and the clubs that have formed through meeting here have a collective personality, for better or worse. I find this community to be competitive, opinionated and territorial. That's okay. I can be (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Lifetime of incandescent 9v LEGO lights?
|
|
Does anyone know how many hours of life one can expect from a 9v incandescent LEGO light? Or if it is in the hundreds of hours or thousands? --Todd (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | how odd!!!!
|
|
have LEGO run out of colouring pigment ?? (URL) have been well played with, but still have lots of clutch, but appear to have missed out on colour. Some of them have grey remenents wierd -- James Stacey ---...--- www.minifig.co.uk #925 - I'm a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Absolutely Nothing! :) (Was: Re: What's so Adult about it Anyway ?)
|
|
(...) Hi David! Although I am no longer among the faithful, I must agree with the sentiment that there is value in keeping young at heart! Religious or not, I love your explanation of how you have come to appreciate the importance of being a child. (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
A better question would be, why do people come (...) got (...) Well, I discuss religion with respect to Legos because my spiritual relationship to Christ is the focus of my life and EVERYTHING else is secondary. If it were possible I wouldnt take a (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Absolutely Nothing! :) (Was: Re: What's so Adult about it Anyway ?)
|
|
I have one particular spin on lego building/playing/sculpting that strikes me quite personally. I had it in my splash page for a while at my bricklink store but Ill give you the edited down version here: (Be forwarned, its based upon my experience (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Re: What's so Adult about it Anyway ? (was: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
Hey Frank - Wish I could devote time to replying to this inline -- but gotta get moving on other stuff tonight. I totally understand the concerns with this. I'm not sure our club's approach to handling this, save the parents' involvement with the (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Don't be afraid to advocate techniques over others, but explain why one is 'better.' I don't think anyone will argue with you that interlocking bricks is better than stacking one on top of each other when building a wall :-) (...) You can show (...) (22 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
|
(...) Many thanks Tim, your reply is really encouraging. I currently try to figure out the best way to write a building tutorial. The three major difficulties are: 1. It is REALLY intimidating to write the first tutorial ever. I don't want to be (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
 | | Re: Some Weird Action Team turns 4 years old!
|
|
(...) Nick, I realy like your site. But I'm one of those people who lurk more than they post. So I read your post and went to your site, having a good time there. BUT I did not respond to your post. Well, that's just li'll me, but my guess is that a (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Some Weird Action Team turns 4 years old!
|
|
(...) This whole issue leaves me unsure of where I stand. On the one hand, I think people should be nice. On the other hand, a few people do seem to constantly be whining that no one posts responses to their posts, or that so and so is being mean (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Some Weird Action Team turns 4 years old!
|
|
(...) I can only suggest to you what I do: ignore Tom's postings. He has a compulsion to flame people. He did it way back on RTL, and he continues to do it here, though he usually restrains himself outside of off-topic debate, so I don't make an (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|
|
 | | Re: Some Weird Action Team turns 4 years old!
|
|
(...) I said before, my previous statement that started this mess was one made out of impulse at the end of a bad day and did not really reflect the way I feel. I would have retracted it/changed it if I could. The reason that I started posting here (...) (22 years ago, 16-Apr-03, to lugnet.general)
|