 | | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
/Start American laziness Ah, it's fine. /End American laziness -Dan (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Weekend Reports 05/30/03
|
|
(...) Done. -JHK (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Weekend Reports 05/30/03
|
|
Galactic Greetings! This weekend came up on me quickly! But I got lucky; there was only one ship that required my attention. All others are either in an active sector or holding by lack of email (or awaiting final info for registration). Perhaps I (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
(...) There's also the small spelling error on the image (psycho?). :) -H. (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
(...) Their problem :D. (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
(...) Yes indeed, the very self-same. Unfortunately, the ship and the bricks are in two locales right now, one 7000 miles from me, and one 8000. So no brick in hand, sadly. I'm working something up, though. :D LFB (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Lindsay Frederick Braun wrote too much to repeat here. Well, these are some interesting views, and I mostly agree. I've been standing back from this whirlwind of discussion for a while, but now I have some ideas to add. (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Richard Parsons wrote some stuff (...) Oh, yeah, those battery issues. Well, considering any ship can produce enough energy to get across a GALAXY in several weeks (or months, even), those have to be some pretty impressive (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
(...) I wouldn't use that as a signature without at least a text ~Dan, because folks reading Lugnet using email nttp programs won't see the image. -JHK (2 URLs) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
(snipped all non-Hendo text) (...) Yes. We are all treated as equals, except Hendo. :). He's the Grand Galactic Mediator Dude. Make him mad and you'll know it. :) (...) Well, I have no problems with ferries with JumpDrives©. :), love doing that (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
(...) What??? ====== Is this the same LFB who made this... (URL) Now, if you made a space ship with that dark gray... -JHK <http:/jhkruer.com (URL) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
(...) Oooh! A thread with colors, and HEY! .starship has over 100 posts now! :) Oh, and Lindsay, as for lack of brick, ABS-related CAD are allowed. You may use any scale you like (mini-fig-, micro-, nano-, macro-, etc.). As for your interjections, (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
(...) Heck no! Get in here :-) (...) I agree completely. (...) The tiers are more a guide to the GM and SMs, and other players. The propulsion tiers impact on galactic movement, but not much on in-sector movement (GM monitors and administers) (...) (21 years ago, 30-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, John P. Henderson wrotemore worthiness. (...) I guess I am (sorry :-). (...) I wonder even if we end up with a 'Full Jump Engine' setting, a 4th and super setting, of which we are each only allowed one. I appreciate your (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
Hi! If I may interject, as someone who's mulling over joining up (unless my lack of any actual Brick at the moment is an intent-killer) and has read the rules as a fresh outsider: (...) This sounds fair. Otherwise, no significant gain is made by (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | (Post for David) Jumpship
|
|
David can't post to LUGNET yet, so I've done it for him. I'm so generous...:) Im still stuck here on the old board because I cant logon to LUGNET. Another thing we could do is Recharge Stations!! In the books Im basing my organization on recharge (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
| |
| | Starship Button
|
|
Galactic Greetings! I have noticed that some of you and some of our associates have links pages on your websites. I invite any who are interested to include a link to the Starship site on their pages: (URL) you may use this image as a button, if (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, Richard Parsons wrote a bunch o' stuff. Hmm. Interesting thoughts. I am happy with the direction of this discussion thus far... (...) So you are proposing a re-write of the previously stated rules on Full JumpShips to (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Rules Talk: JumpShip Ideas
|
|
In lugnet.gaming.starship, John P. Henderson wrote stuff. Currently: (...) Proposedly: (...) I don't want to cruel my own proposals to the Glorious Galactic Grand Guarantor, but (I do want to see good rules made that improve gameplay): These two (...) (21 years ago, 29-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship)
|
| |
| | Re: Commercial Talk: Jump Engines
|
|
(...) Of course, of course. No sense bothering the Grand Galactic Generale with lowly commercial matters now is there? As agreed, if we end up thinking to apply this outside Port Block Yards Fleet Tenders, we'll start talking royalties ;-) Richard (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.gaming.starship, FTX)
|
